IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0330261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Average annual costs of Rheumatoid Arthritis estimated by inverse probability weighting and their influence factors: A cross-sectional study based on Chinese Registry of Rheumatoid arthritis (CREDIT) Cohort

Author

Listed:
  • Bing Yu
  • Lin Qiao
  • Lu Li
  • Keying Zuo
  • Liangming Li
  • Li Wang
  • Nan Jiang
  • Qian Wang
  • Mengtao Li
  • Yanhong Wang
  • Xinping Tian

Abstract

Objective: To date, the evidences of economic burden for the RA individual in the real-world clinical practice were still limited in China. This study aimed to estimate average annual costs of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients using inverse probability weighting (IPW) and their influence factors. Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted and the RA patients who met inclusion criteria on CREDIT cohort were invited to participate the survey. After they signed the informed confirm form, the information of outpatient and inpatient expenditures in the past year were collected through online questionnaires. Medical records were retrieved from the Chinese Rheumatology Information System (CRIS). Propensity scores for sample using the Generalized Boosted Model (GBM) method were used to calculate IPW, so that we produced the weighted population similar to the target of RA patients on CREDIT. Bootstrap methods were used to estimate average costs and 95% confidence intervals with 1,000 samples. Indirect costs were estimated using the human capital approach. Weighted multivariate regression identified factors influencing average annual costs. Results: In this study, a total of 18,507 patients from the CREDIT database met the recruitment criteria. Among them, 1,293 patients from 152 hospitals across 29 provinces in China completed the questionnaire and were included in our analysis. The average annual total costs per patient by the Bootstrap method on the weighted population was about 41,971 CNY (Bootstrap 95%CI: 37,107–47,046 CNY), in which more than 75% were the direct costs. Moreover, in the direct costs, the medical costs accounted for nearly 89% and even half of them (approximately 59.7%) was medication expense. The moderate or high disease activity status, hospitalization in last year, history of comorbidity, the treatment of biologics or glucocorticoids were also found to substantially increase average annual costs of RA in our study. Conclusions: This study provided reliable insight into evaluating the economic burden of RA for the individuals and their families in the real-world clinical practice of China.

Suggested Citation

  • Bing Yu & Lin Qiao & Lu Li & Keying Zuo & Liangming Li & Li Wang & Nan Jiang & Qian Wang & Mengtao Li & Yanhong Wang & Xinping Tian, 2025. "Average annual costs of Rheumatoid Arthritis estimated by inverse probability weighting and their influence factors: A cross-sectional study based on Chinese Registry of Rheumatoid arthritis (CREDIT) ," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330261
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330261
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330261&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0330261?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.