IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0330044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting achievement of clinical goals using machine learning in myasthenia gravis

Author

Listed:
  • Hiroyuki Akamine
  • Akiyuki Uzawa
  • Satoshi Kuwabara
  • Shigeaki Suzuki
  • Yosuke Onishi
  • Manato Yasuda
  • Yukiko Ozawa
  • Naoki Kawaguchi
  • Tomoya Kubota
  • Masanori P Takahashi
  • Yasushi Suzuki
  • Genya Watanabe
  • Takashi Kimura
  • Takamichi Sugimoto
  • Makoto Samukawa
  • Naoya Minami
  • Masayuki Masuda
  • Shingo Konno
  • Yuriko Nagane
  • Kimiaki Utsugisawa

Abstract

Background: Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the production of autoantibodies against neuromuscular junctions, leading to varying degrees of severity and outcomes among patients. This variability makes clinical evaluation crucial for determining appropriate treatment targets. However, accurately assessing Minimal Manifestation (MM) status is challenging, requiring expertise in MG management. Therefore, this study aims to develop a diagnostic model for MM in MG patients by leveraging their clinical scores and machine learning approaches. Methods: This study included 1,603 MG patients enrolled from the Japan MG Registry in the 2021 survey. We employed non-negative matrix factorization to decompose three MG clinical scores (MG composite score, MGADL scale, and MG quality of life (QOL) 15r) into four distinct modules: Diplopia, Ptosis, Systemic symptoms, and QOL. We developed a machine learning model with the four modules to predict MM or better status in MG patients. Using 414 registrants from the Japan MG Registry in the 2015 survey, we validated the model’s performance using various metrics, including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1 score, and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC). Results: The ensemble model achieved an AUROC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.94–0.94), accuracy of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.86–0.88), sensitivity of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.85–0.86), specificity of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.88–0.91), precision of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92–0.94), F1 score of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.88–0.89), and MCC of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.72–0.75) on the validation dataset. Conclusions: The developed MM diagnostic model can effectively predict MM or better status in MG patients, potentially guiding clinicians in determining treatment objectives and evaluating treatment outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiroyuki Akamine & Akiyuki Uzawa & Satoshi Kuwabara & Shigeaki Suzuki & Yosuke Onishi & Manato Yasuda & Yukiko Ozawa & Naoki Kawaguchi & Tomoya Kubota & Masanori P Takahashi & Yasushi Suzuki & Genya W, 2025. "Predicting achievement of clinical goals using machine learning in myasthenia gravis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330044
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330044
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330044&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0330044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.