IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0329758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of physical therapy for locomotive syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Chadapa Rungruangbaiyok
  • Hiroyuki Ohtsuka
  • Charupa Lektip
  • Jiraphat Nawarat
  • Eiji Miyake
  • Keiichiro Aoki
  • Yasuko Inaba
  • Yoshinori Kagaya

Abstract

Locomotive syndrome, characterized by impaired mobility owing to musculoskeletal disorders, poses a significant public health challenge, especially in aging populations. Locomotive syndrome limits physical activity, increases fall risk, leads to dependency, and diminishes quality of life. Effective interventions are urgently required. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of physical therapy in improving the symptoms of locomotive syndrome. A systematic evaluation of its effectiveness compared with other interventions is crucial for informing clinical practice and policy decisions. This systematic review and meta-analysis will follow the PRISMA-P guidelines. Studies involving individuals diagnosed with locomotive syndrome, without restrictions on age, sex, or location, will be included. The reviewed interventions will include exercise programs, manual therapy, neuromuscular stimulation, and balance training, which will be compared with the absence of interventions or alternative therapies. The primary outcomes will include improvements in functional mobility and physical performance, symptom reduction, and the progression of locomotive syndrome. Secondary outcomes will include adherence to therapy, safety, quality of life, and psychological well-being. Randomized controlled and non-randomized controlled trials published in peer-reviewed journals will be searched in PubMed, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PEDro, Ichushi Web, and the Thai-Journal Citation Index Center, without language restrictions. Independent reviewers will perform data extraction and assess the risk of bias. A meta-analysis will be conducted using RevMan 5.4 software, with subgroup analyses to address heterogeneity. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will be used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. This review aims to provide robust evidence on the effectiveness of physical therapy in managing locomotive syndrome and to potentially guide clinical practice and healthcare policy decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Chadapa Rungruangbaiyok & Hiroyuki Ohtsuka & Charupa Lektip & Jiraphat Nawarat & Eiji Miyake & Keiichiro Aoki & Yasuko Inaba & Yoshinori Kagaya, 2025. "Effectiveness of physical therapy for locomotive syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-10, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0329758
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0329758
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0329758&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0329758?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0329758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.