IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0329692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The consistency of Federalist Society-affiliated U.S. supreme court justices

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Komatsu
  • Paul M Collins Jr

Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court has recently undergone a dramatic turn to the right, fundamentally reshaping law and politics in America. In this article, we examine one reason for this shift: the increasingly prominent role of the Federalist Society in the conservative legal movement. An analysis of almost 25,000 votes of Supreme Court justices from 1986–2022 shows that justices affiliated with the Federalist Society are about 10 percentage points more likely to cast a conservative vote than their non-affiliated counterparts, and the voting behavior of Federalist Society-affiliates is more ideologically consistent than non-affiliated justices. Because justices in the contemporary era serve on the Court for an average of about a quarter century, these findings indicate that we are likely to see the Court’s conservative justices – who are all Federalist Society-affiliates – continue to advance the conservative legal movement’s agenda for decades to come.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Komatsu & Paul M Collins Jr, 2025. "The consistency of Federalist Society-affiliated U.S. supreme court justices," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-9, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0329692
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0329692
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0329692&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0329692?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0329692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.