Author
Listed:
- Esther L Langmack
- Dana Ravyn
- Rob Lowney
- Beth Goodwin
- William R Lumry
Abstract
Treatment options for hereditary angioedema (HAE) have evolved due to discoveries in basic and clinical research. HAE clinical guidelines emphasize optimizing quality of life through attack prevention strategies that include long-term prophylaxis. We sought to identify barriers to and promoters of research translation into HAE clinical practice that may inform efforts to improve patient care. We interviewed US allergy/immunology clinicians who completed an online continuing medical education activity on HAE or were identified through healthcare provider directories. Interviews focused on clinicians’ experiences translating HAE research results into clinical care. Deidentified interview transcripts were coded and analyzed to detect emergent themes using Dedoose software. Thematic analysis of 15 interviews showed that insurance prior authorization for HAE medications, including those for long-term prophylaxis, was perceived as the biggest barrier to evidence-based care. Other prominent barriers were laboratory testing difficulties, time constraints, and deficits in both primary care provider and patient understanding of HAE. Promoters of research translation included availability of medication samples, route/frequency of drug administration, and shared decision-making. Clinicians used different resources to learn about HAE, including online chat rooms. None of the clinicians used a validated instrument to assess HAE-related quality of life. Perceptions of the usefulness of HAE clinical guidelines were mixed. A range of factors act as barriers and promoters to research translation into clinical care for patients with HAE. Our findings have implications for interventions to enhance the delivery of evidence-based care for patients with HAE.
Suggested Citation
Esther L Langmack & Dana Ravyn & Rob Lowney & Beth Goodwin & William R Lumry, 2025.
"Barriers and promoters to adapting research findings to clinical care in hereditary angioedema in the United States: A qualitative study,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-13, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0329585
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329585
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0329585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.