Author
Abstract
Denture base fractures are a common issue, particularly in overdentures, necessitating high fracture toughness in denture base polymers to withstand oral mechanical loads. Despite the importance of fracture resistance, current denture base materials often fall short of meeting the required standards. The literature shows conflicting results regarding the fracture toughness of three-dimensional (3D)-printed materials compared to conventional and milled options. This study aimed to address this gap by evaluating the fracture toughness of commercially available digital denture base resins, including two CAD/CAM-milled and two 3D-printed materials. Using a three-point bending test on notched beams according to ISO 20795–1:2013 standards, the study compared the fracture toughness of FormLabs denture base LP, NextDent Denture 3D, AvaDent, and XANTECH PMMA. Results revealed that NextDent exhibited the highest fracture toughness, suggesting better crack propagation resistance. Printed acrylic (NextDent) and prepolymerized polymethyl methacrylate (AvaDent and XANTECH) demonstrated superior fracture toughness compared to Formlabs photopolymerized diurethane methacrylate. However, none of the tested materials met the ISO’s highest impact resistance requirements. These findings highlight the variability in fracture toughness among different manufacturing techniques and compositions, emphasizing the need for further research to develop denture base materials with enhanced impact resistance. This study provides valuable insights for clinicians in material selection for denture fabrication and underscores the importance of continued innovation in dental materials to improve the longevity and performance of prosthetic devices.
Suggested Citation
Walaa A Babeer, 2025.
"Fracture toughness of three-dimensional printed and milled denture bases,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-14, August.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0329556
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329556
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0329556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.