IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0329299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative effectiveness and safety of insulin reference biologics versus biosimilars for types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus: Protocol for a systematic review of real-world studies

Author

Listed:
  • Martin K H Ho
  • Araniy Santhireswaran
  • Tara Gomes
  • Muhammad Mamdani
  • Mina Tadrous

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus is characterized by insulin deficiency or resistance. The two main types of diabetes mellitus are type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 (T2DM). Insulin is the mainstay of therapy for T1DM and often the last-line therapy for T2DM. Biosimilar insulins are cost-saving alternatives to reference products that may improve access for patients and sustainability for healthcare systems. Despite supporting evidence from randomized controlled trials, biosimilar insulin uptake is poor, and real-world evidence of their safety and effectiveness is limited. Objective: Our objective is to compare the real-world effectiveness and safety of insulin biosimilars versus reference products in adults with diabetes mellitus. Eligibility criteria: We will include observational studies and open-label pragmatic randomized controlled trials. We will exclude other randomized controlled trials, literature reviews, meta-analyses, case series, case reports, study protocols, opinion pieces, and conference abstracts. Our primary effectiveness outcome will be glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and our primary safety outcome will be hypoglycemia. Our secondary outcomes will include fasting plasma glucose; time in range; microvascular complications; health-related quality of life; physician visits, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions for hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and diabetic ketoacidosis; weight gain; immunogenicity; injection site reactions; and incident cancers. Methods: The search strategy combines three key concepts: diabetes, insulin, and biosimilars. We will conduct a structured search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts. We will also search in grey literature databases, targeted websites, and the Google search engine. Finally, we will scan forward and backward citations. Articles will be screened, extracted, and appraised independently by two reviewers. Data will be descriptively summarized. Discussion: Our systematic review of the real-world evidence on biosimilar insulins can help support clinical and policy decisions that impact the care of patients with T1DM or T2DM.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin K H Ho & Araniy Santhireswaran & Tara Gomes & Muhammad Mamdani & Mina Tadrous, 2025. "Comparative effectiveness and safety of insulin reference biologics versus biosimilars for types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus: Protocol for a systematic review of real-world studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-8, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0329299
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0329299
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0329299&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0329299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0329299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.