IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0329293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Signed log-likelihood ratio test for the scale parameter of Poisson Inverse Weibull distribution with the development of PIW4LIFETIME web application

Author

Listed:
  • Sukanya Yodnual
  • Jularat Chumnaul

Abstract

The three-parameter Poisson Inverse Weibull (PIW) distribution offers enhanced flexibility for modeling system failure times. This study introduces the signed log-likelihood ratio test (SLRT) for hypothesis testing of the scale parameter (ω) in the PIW distribution and compares its performance with the test based on the asymptotic normality of maximum likelihood estimators (ANMLE). Simulation studies show that the SLRT consistently maintains type I error rates within the acceptable range of 0.04 to 0.06 at a significance level of 0.05, satisfying Cochran’s criterion across various sample sizes and parameter configurations. In contrast, the ANMLE method tends to be conservative, often underestimating the nominal significance level. In terms of empirical power, the SLRT outperforms the ANMLE, particularly in small-sample scenarios (n = 10, 15), and maintains superior power across all tested configurations. For example, when testing H0:ω=0.25 against H1:ω=0.5 with β=0.5,λ=1, and n = 10, the SLRT achieves a power of 0.6621, compared to 0.4181 for the ANMLE, demonstrating the SLRT’s robustness and reliability in limited-data. Moreover, the ANMLE generally exhibits low power in most cases, indicating reduced sensitivity to detecting true effects in small samples. However, with medium and large sample sizes (n = 30, 50, 80 and 100), the power of the ANMLE begins to approach that of the SLRT. Despite this, the ANMLE never outperforms the SLRT, highlighting a fundamental limitation of this method. Additionally, varying the shape parameter β while fixing λ=1 showed a negligible impact on power, further confirming the robustness of the SLRT. Sensitivity analyses also validate the reliability of the SLRT under extreme values of ω and across different sample sizes. To support practical application, the PIW4LIFETIME web application (accessible at https://jularatchumnaul.shinyapps.io/PIW4LIFETIME/) was developed to enable users to assess whether data fit the PIW distribution, estimate model parameters using maximum likelihood, and perform two-sided test for the scale parameter using SLRT. The performance of the proposed method and the PIW4LIFETIME web application was demonstrated through a real-world example.

Suggested Citation

  • Sukanya Yodnual & Jularat Chumnaul, 2025. "Signed log-likelihood ratio test for the scale parameter of Poisson Inverse Weibull distribution with the development of PIW4LIFETIME web application," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-27, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0329293
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0329293
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0329293&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0329293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0329293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.