IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0329029.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological consultation apps in Saudi Arabia: A study for experts’ evaluation and users’ points of view

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulmohsen Saud Albesher
  • Maymunah Faheem Alwahib

Abstract

Medical consultation applications (apps) have rapidly proliferated globally. One type of app is the psychological consultation app, which has made visiting doctors more convenient, particularly for individuals who feel embarrassed about consulting a psychiatrist. However, only a few researchers have examined the usability or user experience of such apps. This study aims to evaluate the user experience of psychological consultation apps in Saudi Arabia, specifically focusing on the usability aspects and user satisfaction of the apps “Labayh,” “Estenarah,” and “Mind.” The research employs two methodologies: First, an expert evaluation using the SMART heuristic framework, developed to assess the usability of mobile apps by identifying usability issues based on established principles. Results from this method revealed that all three apps faced challenges, particularly in SMART 5 (Each interface should focus on one task) and SMART 10 (Cater for diverse mobile environments). Second, a sentiment analysis of user reviews from app stores was conducted, categorizing feedback into positive and negative reviews. User reviews were collected using Heedzy, an online tool designed for extracting reviews from mobile apps. Data cleaning was performed using Python libraries, which handled missing data and removed duplicate entries. Out of 459 reviews analyzed, 51% were negative, focusing primarily on general dissatisfaction and functionality issues, while 49% were positive, highlighting user appreciation and the innovative concept of online consultations. Specific findings indicated that the “Mind” app had significant usability concerns, receiving a severity rating of 70, with notable issues in error prevention and interface clarity. Recommendations for improvement include enhancing task-focused design, increasing adaptability for diverse mobile environments, and addressing user feedback to refine app functionalities. This research contributes valuable insights for designers aiming to improve the usability of psychological consultation apps in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulmohsen Saud Albesher & Maymunah Faheem Alwahib, 2025. "Psychological consultation apps in Saudi Arabia: A study for experts’ evaluation and users’ points of view," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0329029
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0329029
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0329029&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0329029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0329029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.