IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0328932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The assessment of psychometric properties of childbirth violence questionnaire in Iranian women

Author

Listed:
  • Molouk Jaafarpour
  • Ziba Taghizadeh
  • Abbas Ebadi
  • Fatemeh Abbaszadeh
  • Fatemeh Najafi
  • Ashraf Direkvand-Moghaddam

Abstract

Background: Childbirth violence is a cultural and social issue with a complex and multidimensional nature that silently threatens women’s health around the world. Thus, designing an instrument based on social norms and the cultural context of society is an essential need. The study aims to develop and validate a measurement instrument that assesses childbirth violence, focusing on the experiences of women during childbirth. Methods: The study utilized a mixed-methods approach which is a combination of qualitative and quantitative research methodologies and evaluated a new tool for assessing violence during childbirth. It included three main phases: Instrument Development, Validity, and Reliability. The instrument’s validity was tested through exploratory factor analysis (EFA). To assess sampling adequacy, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index. Multiple extraction and rotation techniques were employed to determine the optimal questionnaire structure. Results: After completing the qualitative phase, the research team focused on two key themes: the violation of pregnant mothers’ rights within the healthcare system and societal factors contributing to violence against pregnant mothers. 99 items were identified based on participants’ perspectives and interviews. Existing questionnaires on respectful maternal care were reviewed, but none specifically targeted childbirth violence. A comprehensive pool of 108 items was refined to a preliminary questionnaire with 65 items for psychometric testing. EFA, based on maximum likelihood and varimax rotation, concealed that questionnaire contains four factors including; psychological and physical abuse, non-professional care, delay in offering care and lack of family support. These factors explained 63.276% of the total variance. Cronbach’s alpha (0.88–0.90), (ICC = 0.95 (and (SEM = 3.2), confirmed the sufficient reliability of the Childbirth Violence Questionnaire with 34 items (CBVQ-34). Conclusions: The CBVQ is a unique tool to assess childbirth violence through mothers’ experiences during natural birth or emergency cesarean sections. It focuses on violence from care teams, the health system, and families, unlike existing tools that mainly highlight the care team’s relationship with the mother. The CBVQ also considers the health system’s structures and family support, distinguishing it from other tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Molouk Jaafarpour & Ziba Taghizadeh & Abbas Ebadi & Fatemeh Abbaszadeh & Fatemeh Najafi & Ashraf Direkvand-Moghaddam, 2025. "The assessment of psychometric properties of childbirth violence questionnaire in Iranian women," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0328932
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0328932
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0328932&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0328932?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0328932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.