IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0328715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Depression and weight loss trajectories during an integrated behavioral intervention: Within-treatment analysis of the RAINBOW trial

Author

Listed:
  • Bailey W Osweiler
  • Daphne Lew
  • Nan Lv
  • Jun Ma
  • Thomas G Kannampallil

Abstract

Introduction: Depression and obesity are two of the most common chronic conditions among US adults. The Research Aimed at Improving Both Mood and Weight (RAINBOW) study was the first randomized clinical trial to demonstrate the effectiveness of an integrated behavioral treatment for depression and obesity. We aimed to characterize the trajectories of both depression symptoms and weight loss during the RAINBOW intervention. Methods: Participants (N = 201) randomly assigned to the RAINBOW treatment arm who provided serial data on depression symptoms (via the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ9]) and self-measured weight were included. Group-Based Multi-Trajectory Modeling is a statistical technique that identifies participants who follow similar trajectories of multiple outcomes over time. This approach was used to characterize latent groups of both PHQ9 and weight loss percentage during treatment. Demographic differences between groups were investigated using Chi-Square, Fisher’s exact tests, or ANOVA tests. Group membership was investigated for relationships with 12-month change in independently measured depression (via the 20-item Symptom Checklist, or SCL20) and weight (measured by trained research staff) using linear regression models. Results: Participants were classified into 3 groups based on their depression symptom and weight trajectories: Moderate Depression Improvements/Minimal Weight Loss (N = 108, 53.7%), Substantial Depression Improvements/Moderate Weight Loss (N = 58, 28.9%), and Substantial Depression Improvements/Substantial Weight Loss (N = 35; 17.4%). Older participants were more likely to be in the Substantial/Substantial group. Participants in the Substantial/Moderate and Substantial/Substantial groups had larger 12-month depression symptom score changes and 12-month weight loss compared to the Moderate/Minimal group. Conclusion: We identified three joint trajectories of depression symptom scores and obesity. Members in the three trajectories saw varying degrees of symptom reduction from baseline to 12 months. Results suggest adaptive treatment trials may be needed for participants in groups with lower anticipated depression symptom scores and/or weight reductions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bailey W Osweiler & Daphne Lew & Nan Lv & Jun Ma & Thomas G Kannampallil, 2025. "Depression and weight loss trajectories during an integrated behavioral intervention: Within-treatment analysis of the RAINBOW trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0328715
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0328715
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0328715&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0328715?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0328715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.