IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0328709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of aPTT predictors after unfractionated heparin administration in intensive care units using machine learning models

Author

Listed:
  • Tadashi Kamio
  • Masaru Ikegami
  • Megumi Mizuno
  • Seiichiro Ishii
  • Hayato Tajima
  • Yoshihito Machida
  • Kiyomitsu Fukaguchi

Abstract

Objectives: Predicting optimal coagulation control using heparin in intensive care units (ICUs) remains a significant challenge. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in ICU patients receiving unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation and to identify key predictive factors. Methods: Data were obtained from the Tokushukai Medical Database, covering six hospitals with ICUs in Japan, collected between 2018 and 2022. The study included 945 ICU patients who received unfractionated heparin. The dataset comprised both static and dynamic features, which were used to construct and train ML models. Models were developed to predict aPTT following initial and multiple heparin doses. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC), area under the precision–recall curve (PR AUC), precision, recall, F1 score, and accuracy. SHAP analysis was conducted to determine key predictive factors. Results: The random forest model demonstrated the highest predictive performance, with ROC AUC values of 0.707 for the first infusion and 0.732 for multiple infusions. Corresponding PR AUC values were 0.539 and 0.551. Despite moderate overall predictive performance, the model exhibited high precision (0.585 for the first infusion and 0.589 for multiple infusions), indicating effectiveness in correctly identifying true positive cases. However, recall and F1 scores were lower, suggesting that some cases, particularly in sub-therapeutic and supra-therapeutic ranges, may have been missed. Incorporating time-series data, such as vital signs, provided only marginal improvements in performance. Conclusions: ML models demonstrated moderate performance in predicting aPTT following heparin infusion in ICU patients, with the random forest model achieving the highest classification accuracy. Although the models effectively identified true positive cases, their overall predictive performance remained limited, necessitating further refinement. The inclusion of static and dynamic features did not significantly enhance model accuracy. Future studies should explore additional factors to improve predictive models for optimizing individualized anticoagulation management in ICUs.

Suggested Citation

  • Tadashi Kamio & Masaru Ikegami & Megumi Mizuno & Seiichiro Ishii & Hayato Tajima & Yoshihito Machida & Kiyomitsu Fukaguchi, 2025. "Analysis of aPTT predictors after unfractionated heparin administration in intensive care units using machine learning models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0328709
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0328709
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0328709&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0328709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0328709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.