IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0328631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-effectiveness assessment of liquid biopsy for early detection of lung cancer in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Kátia Marie Senna
  • Ivan Ricardo Zimmermann
  • Márcia Gisele Santos da Costa
  • Bernardo Rangel Tura
  • José Ronyeryson dos Santos Evangelista
  • Marisa Santos

Abstract

Introduction: Lung cancer has a low survival rate due to late diagnosis, with most cases detected at advanced stages. Liquid biopsy, a non-invasive alternative to tissue biopsy, has emerged as a potential screening tool for early lung cancer detection. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of liquid biopsy screening using an autoantibody test (EarlyCDT-Lung®) in high-risk populations from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). Methods: A decision-analytic model was developed, combining a decision tree and a Markov model to compare two strategies: standard clinical diagnosis without screening and liquid biopsy screening followed by confirmatory diagnostics. Model inputs included test accuracy, treatment costs, and survival data derived from systematic reviews, national registries, and published economic evaluations. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Sensitivity analyses assessed model robustness. Results: Liquid biopsy screening analysis of a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 individuals at high-risk of lung cancer resulted in an incremental cost of $ 570,120 and an incremental effectiveness of 7.56 QALYs, with an ICER of $ 75,435.63 per QALY gained. This result has far exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold in Brazil ($ 7,017.54–21,052.62/QALY). Therefore, in case of assuming no significant cost reductions or accuracy improvements, the strategy would only become cost-effective in contexts where lung cancer prevalence exceeds 4.0%. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed a low likelihood of cost-effectiveness, even with varying test sensitivity, lung cancer prevalence, and cost assumptions. Discussion: The adoption of an autoantibody test as a liquid biopsy for early lung cancer screening in high-risk populations in Brazil led to increased costs and was not considered cost-effective under the thresholds commonly applied in the Brazilian context.

Suggested Citation

  • Kátia Marie Senna & Ivan Ricardo Zimmermann & Márcia Gisele Santos da Costa & Bernardo Rangel Tura & José Ronyeryson dos Santos Evangelista & Marisa Santos, 2025. "Cost-effectiveness assessment of liquid biopsy for early detection of lung cancer in Brazil," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0328631
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0328631
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0328631&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0328631?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0328631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.