IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0328355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk factors for pulmonary infection in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaoyang Wei
  • Wenhao Su
  • Hairong Jia
  • Luo Yang
  • Jiaqi Zhang
  • Yanru Wang

Abstract

Background: Lung infection is a prevalent chronic consequence of diabetes. Abnormal blood sugar levels, vascular endothelial damage, and alterations in capillary permeability predispose diabetes patients to lung infections. Currently, there is no comprehensive review addressing the risk factors for lung infection in diabetes. Consequently, our objective is to conduct a systematic review of the existing risk factors for lung infection in diabetes and offer recommendations for the targeted enhancement of treatment strategies. Methods and analysis: We will search five English literature databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library) and 4 Chinese databases (CNKI, WanFang, SinoMed and VIP) since the founding of the database until December 01, 2024. We will perform a systematic examination and meta-analysis of cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies to identify all population-based risk factors for diabetes patients with pulmonary infection. Two researchers will independently assess the publication, extract data, and evaluate the quality and potential biases present in the study. We will utilize RevMan 5.4 software and STATA 16.0 for data analysis. The included studies will be assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Quality Assessment Instrument (NOS) and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). If the heterogeneity of the included studies is excessively high, we will perform subgroup and sensitivity analysis to identify probable sources of heterogeneity. The assessment of publication bias will be conducted using a funnel plot. Furthermore, we will employ the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the quality of evidence for each exposure and outcome of interest. Discussion: This article introduces a research protocol to explore the influencing factors of pulmonary infection in diabetes. The results of this study will summarize the evidence of influencing factors of pulmonary infection in diabetes at present. We hope to provide reliable advice for clinicians to make decisions, so as to support the implementation of effective prevention strategies for diabetes pulmonary infection. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024606429

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaoyang Wei & Wenhao Su & Hairong Jia & Luo Yang & Jiaqi Zhang & Yanru Wang, 2025. "Risk factors for pulmonary infection in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-7, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0328355
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0328355
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0328355&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0328355?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0328355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.