IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0328342.html

Feeding activity of Eisenia andrei and Enchytraeus albidus under different soil moisture regimes assessed by the bait-lamina test

Author

Listed:
  • Gilda Dell’Ambrogio
  • Sophie Campiche
  • Janine W Y Wong
  • Mathieu Renaud
  • Christina Lüthi
  • Inge Werner
  • Benoit J D Ferrari

Abstract

The bait-lamina test is an easy and efficient method to quantify the feeding activity of soil invertebrates. However, under natural conditions, feeding activity is influenced by environmental factors such as soil moisture content, whose effects on test outcomes remain insufficiently quantified, complicating interpretation. In this study, we optimized the bait-lamina test under laboratory conditions, to assess the influence of soil moisture content on feeding activity of the earthworm Eisenia andrei and the enchytraeid Enchytraeus albidus, using LUFA 2.2 standard soil (LUFA Speyer, Speyer, Germany) as a substrate. Feeding activity increased linearly with increasing soil moisture until an optimal moisture content, which was 52% of the maximum water holding capacity (WHC) for earthworms, and between 49 and 68% WHC for enchytraeids. Above these optima, feeding activity was reduced and was less dependent on soil moisture. The increase in feeding activity up to the peak was described by different slopes for the two species. Earthworms consumed the bait faster (on a per unit weight basis) than enchytraeids. Among the two species, the relationship established for E. albidus was the more similar to the response obtained in field conditions. Within the range of soil moistures considered by the model, our results demonstrate that feeding activity is positively correlated with soil moisture for two important soil invertebrates, although this increase, the optimal soil moisture content, and the speed of bait consumption are species-dependent. The model produced provides a first quantitative framework describing these relationships and can serve as a basis for future studies testing its applicability across different soil types. Such research would represent a first step for normalizing results from bait lamina tests under field conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Gilda Dell’Ambrogio & Sophie Campiche & Janine W Y Wong & Mathieu Renaud & Christina Lüthi & Inge Werner & Benoit J D Ferrari, 2026. "Feeding activity of Eisenia andrei and Enchytraeus albidus under different soil moisture regimes assessed by the bait-lamina test," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0328342
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0328342
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0328342&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0328342?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0328342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.