IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0328330.html

Development and validation of prediction models for predicting social care strengths and vulnerability in older people: Cohort study using routine data in Adult Social Care

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Clarkson
  • Fiona Lerigo
  • Glen P Martin
  • Leo Wall
  • Sue Davies
  • Goran Nenadic
  • Paul Hine
  • Catherine Robinson

Abstract

In Adult Social Care, UK local authorities have statutory responsibilities for assessing needs and delivering services to ensure adults’ wellbeing. Administrative data collected during this process may help local authorities’ compliance with these duties. We developed and internally validated predictive models for older people (>- 60 years) receiving social care for whether they remained at home or were admitted to care homes, two years after index assessments, using administrative data from one English City authority. We enquired whether the right data, to predict older people’s vulnerability to adverse outcome (care home) or evidence their strengths (remaining at home), were present in local authority systems, and if accurate datasets for large numbers of older people could be constructed to allow robust modelling. Logistic regression models were created with binary outcome (remaining at home/entering care homes). Sample size calculations determined the maximum number of candidate predictors we could consider for model development. 20,218 older people in the data cohort indicated we could consider a maximum of 46 candidate predictor parameters. In our final analyses we considered 31 candidate predictor parameters, in the areas of: age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation, housing tenure, abilities in activities of daily living, access to carer, Primary Support Reason, diagnosis of dementia. We used all data for model development and internal validation using cross-validation. Models were robust as to assumptions, with no evidence of overfitting and good predictive accuracy. Circumstances predicting strongly that older people would not remain at home were that they were: from other (non-white) ethnic groups, privately rented tenants or other (unstable) tenancies, not able to eat or keep their home habitable without difficulty, with their Primary Support Reason for personal care, mental health, or support with cognition. With public involvement partners, we created a prototype index for local authority use to inform professional decisions and/or local planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Clarkson & Fiona Lerigo & Glen P Martin & Leo Wall & Sue Davies & Goran Nenadic & Paul Hine & Catherine Robinson, 2026. "Development and validation of prediction models for predicting social care strengths and vulnerability in older people: Cohort study using routine data in Adult Social Care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0328330
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0328330
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0328330&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0328330?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0328330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.