Author
Listed:
- Qiaohui Tong
- Wei Wei
- Yekai Le
Abstract
Green renovation of building (GRB) is usually full of challenges and limited by multiple factors, including environment, technology, materials, and region. It is necessary to lower the impact on residents’ lives and reasonably address construction waste during the renovation process. In this study, a system dynamics model was constructed according to the whole lifecycle theory and green development theory to evaluate the comprehensive benefits of GRB. This model was adopted to analyze the constraints during the renovation process. In addition, the key indicators, were simulated, including pollution, greenness, and resident satisfaction. The system dynamics model simulation results indicated that during the decision-making and project phases, the simulated greenness value of GRB reached 1.623, with a variation value of 1.515. This finding substantiated the substantial influence of this phase on greenness transformation. During the engineering warranty and post-evaluation phase, the greenness change value was the highest of 6.173. Therefore, long-term maintenance and continuous improvement are crucial for greenness. Meanwhile, the proportion of green energy usage gradually increased during the GRB process, while other energy consumption and pollution indicators decreased. This demonstrated the potential of GRB in promoting sustainable development. The study has validated the efficacy of the simulation and analysis of GRB projects through the system dynamics method while providing theoretical foundations for the planning and implementation of GRB projects. By comprehensively considering technological, economic, policy, and social factors, system dynamics model can assist decision-makers in optimizing GRB strategies, achieving a dual improvement in environmental and economic benefits.
Suggested Citation
Qiaohui Tong & Wei Wei & Yekai Le, 2025.
"Constraints on green renovation of building based on the theory of whole lifecycle and green development,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-24, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0328148
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328148
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0328148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.