IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0327964.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Type of pre-existing chronic conditions and their associations with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) treatment: Prediction and interpretation using machine learning methods

Author

Listed:
  • Yves Paul Vincent Mbous
  • Zasim Azhar Siddiqui
  • Murtuza Bharmal
  • Traci LeMasters
  • Joanna Kolodney
  • George A Kelley
  • Khalid Kamal
  • Usha Sambamoorthi

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the prevalence of pre-existing chronic conditions and their association with the receipt of specific cancer-directed treatments among older adults with incident primary Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) using novel predictive and interpretable machine learning methods. Methods: We adopted a retrospective cohort study design with data from linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry and Medicare Fee-For-Service claims databases of older adults (≥ 66 years) diagnosed with primary incident MCC between 2008 and 2017. The study cohort consisted of 1,668 older adults with incident MCC and continuous fee-for-service Medicare enrollment for 24 months. Chronic conditions were identified during 12 months before cancer diagnosis date. Type of any MCC treatment (surgery-SRx, radiotherapy-RTx, chemotherapy-CTx, immunotherapy-ITx, and hormonal therapy-HTx) were derived for 12 months following cancer diagnosis. Receipt of any of these treatments and their associations with pre-existing chronic conditions were analyzed using separate eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) predictive models and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) methods. Results: High cholesterol (75.5%), HIV (71.5%), hypertension (67.7%), arthritis (54.9%), coronary artery disease (47.1%), diabetes (43.5%), and hepatitis (37.1%) were some of the highly prevalent pre-existing chronic conditions. MCC treatment varied by type of chronic conditions and treatment modality. For example, a lower percentage of those with hypertension received ITx compared to those without hypertension (5.7% vs. 17.1%). A higher percentage of those with high cholesterol (13.9% vs 10.8%) received HTx compared to those without high cholesterol. XGBoost predictions revealed high predictive accuracy (area under the curve ranged from 0.72 (CTx) to 0.99 (ITx)). Hypertension (ITx), diabetes and thyroid disorders (HTx), congestive heart failure (RTx), and high cholesterol (CTx) were among the top ten predictors of MCC treatment. Congestive heart failure (RTx), hypertension (CTx), heart disease (ITx), thyroid disorders (HTx), and osteoporosis (HTx) positively predicted treatment, whereas high cholesterol (CTx), hypertension (ITx, HTx) and diabetes (ITx, HTx) negatively predicted treatment. Conclusions: Pre-existing conditions were highly prevalent among older MCC adults. Cardiovascular and metabolic diseases were the top 10 leading predictors of cancer treatment. However, the associations varied by type of treatment. In spite of the good performance of the model, especially for ITx and HTx, there is a need to replicate these findings using other data sources that provide access to larger population subgroups.

Suggested Citation

  • Yves Paul Vincent Mbous & Zasim Azhar Siddiqui & Murtuza Bharmal & Traci LeMasters & Joanna Kolodney & George A Kelley & Khalid Kamal & Usha Sambamoorthi, 2025. "Type of pre-existing chronic conditions and their associations with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) treatment: Prediction and interpretation using machine learning methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327964
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327964
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327964&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0327964?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.