Author
Listed:
- Jamuna Bhattarai
- Muna Rana
- Subhadra Khakurel
- Usha Yadav
- Heema Sunar
Abstract
Background: Stress and job dissatisfaction are significant factors leading to reduced efficiency and loss of human resources in all sectors, especially nursing education. This study aimed to compare the levels of stress, and job satisfaction among nursing faculty members in government and private colleges in Nepal. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was employed and conducted across nursing colleges in both the government and private sectors of Nepal. A total of 576 faculties were conveniently recruited from 13 government colleges and 26 private colleges for this study. The data were summarized using descriptive and inferential statistics, comparing the results between the faculties of the government and the private colleges. Results: Among the 576 respondents, 24.7% reported high levels of stress, while the majority (62.7%) were ambivalent about their job and less than one-third were satisfied. The majority of the respondents working in government colleges reported lower stress levels. Regarding job satisfaction, 8.9% of respondents were dissatisfied, and 30.7% were satisfied in government colleges, which was 2% higher than in private colleges. More than half of the respondents were ambivalent about their jobs in both private (63.7%) and government colleges (60.3%). The levels of stress, and job satisfaction did not significantly differ between government and private colleges. Conclusions: Stress levels are slightly higher in private colleges, while faculty members in government colleges report greater job satisfaction. Future research could be directed towards the identification of ways to reduce stress and promote satisfaction among nursing faculties, especially in private colleges.
Suggested Citation
Jamuna Bhattarai & Muna Rana & Subhadra Khakurel & Usha Yadav & Heema Sunar, 2025.
"Stress and job satisfaction among nursing faculties in academic institutions in Nepal: A cross-sectional comparison between government and private institutions,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-17, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0327657
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327657
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.