IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0327653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods for improving the identification of acute stroke during ambulance calls: A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Areej Almutairi
  • Fadila Wirawan
  • Adam Lloyd
  • Tom Moullaali
  • Gareth Clegg

Abstract

Background: Accurately identifying strokes during ambulance calls remains challenging, leading to low diagnostic accuracy and delays in dispatching appropriate services. Limited evidence exists regarding methods for improving call handlers’ stroke recognition. This scoping review explores methods for enhancing stroke identification during emergency calls in ambulance control centres (ACCs). Methods: We conducted a scoping review following the methodology of the Joanna Briggs Institute and adhered to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search was performed across five databases: Embase, Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL, also grey literature sources, covering publications from January 1964 to July 2024. We included studies that examined methods to improve stroke identification during emergency calls in ACCs. To assess the effectiveness of these methods, eligible studies must evaluate at least one of the following outcomes: accuracy of stroke diagnosis, time to diagnosis, effectiveness of staff training, and acceptability of identification techniques. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted the data, and conducted an inductive thematic analysis to identify common themes. Results: Of the 3,619 studies identified, seven met the inclusion criteria. Included studies focused on technology and algorithms (n = 3), training and educational programs (n = 2), and improved triage tools (n = 2) to enhance stroke identification during emergency calls to ACCs. Studies on technology and algorithms have reported increased stroke identification sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) when using new algorithms compared to standard protocols. Training programs have led to improved dispatcher sensitivity in stroke recognition. Improved triage tools also reduce time-to-diagnosis and facilitate quicker emergency responses. Conclusion: This review highlights several methods for improving stroke identification in ACCs. Despite improvements in PPV, sensitivity, and diagnosis time, the lack of generalised standards, single-centre studies, and various population characteristics hinder broader impact. Future research should prioritise well-designed studies with standardised benchmarks to determine effectiveness, enabling effective prehospital stroke identification strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Areej Almutairi & Fadila Wirawan & Adam Lloyd & Tom Moullaali & Gareth Clegg, 2025. "Methods for improving the identification of acute stroke during ambulance calls: A scoping review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327653
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327653
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327653&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0327653?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.