IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0327640.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring confidence development in interprofessional teams: A pre-post analysis of a health and social care education module

Author

Listed:
  • Sharron Blumenthal
  • Sivaramkumar Shanmugam
  • Jamie McDermott
  • John Locke
  • Tamsin Fitzgerald
  • Christopher Duncan
  • Kareena McAloney-Kocaman
  • Lindsey Burns

Abstract

Aim: Confidence can be defined as a strong belief, firm trust, or sure expectation in relation to achieving an outcome. The study aimed to examine change in confidence to collaborate in teams in undergraduate health and social care students undertaking a mandatory 6-week IPE module using the Team Observed Professional Encounter (TOSPE). Method: A pre-test post-test study was undertaken. Confidence was measured using the validated Interprofessional Education Academic Behavioural Confidence Scale. Independent t-tests and Analysis of Variance were used to establish differences between groups at the commencement of the study. To compare pre and post confidence scores paired t-tests were used for normally distributed data, and Wilcoxon signed rank test were undertaken for non-normally distributed data. Cohen’s d and Pearson r were produced as measures of effect size. A mixed design Analysis of Variance was conducted to examine the influence of categorical variables on changes in confidence scores. Results: Data were included from 80 matched pairs. Pre-test self-perceived scores for Total Confidence and the subscales for Interprofessional Team Working, Interprofessional Communication and Behaviours Underpinning Collaboration increased significantly (p =

Suggested Citation

  • Sharron Blumenthal & Sivaramkumar Shanmugam & Jamie McDermott & John Locke & Tamsin Fitzgerald & Christopher Duncan & Kareena McAloney-Kocaman & Lindsey Burns, 2025. "Exploring confidence development in interprofessional teams: A pre-post analysis of a health and social care education module," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327640
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327640
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327640&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0327640?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.