Author
Listed:
- Chaoncin Sooksriwong
- Ekapong Kachai
- Wanruchada Katchamart
- Ponlapat Rojnuckarin
- Ekaphop Sirachainan
- Tuangrat Phodha
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the discriminant factors and determine the cutoff value which can predict or classify the group of prescribed and non-prescribed biosimilar among Thai physicians. The online surveys were distributed to physicians via major three medical associations in Thailand. Five psychological variables were obtained from the surveys (familiarity, attitude toward biosimilar medication, attitude toward biosimilar practice scenarios, attitude toward naming biosimilars in prescriptions, and attitude toward pricing of biosimilar). The point-based system was used to score all variables and transformed to percentage. The assumptions were tested before using discriminant function analysis (DFA). Total 82 respondents were analyzed. Data of all variables met the assumptions of DFA. Familiarity was the most influential factor to differentiate the group of physicians, followed by attitude toward biosimilar medication. The cutoff value for group differences was −0.600. The accuracy rate of discriminant function equations was 82.9% overall for the stepwise method. The study concluded that the psychological factors such as familiarity with biosimilars and attitude toward biosimilars would play a significant role to classify between prescribed and non-prescribed biosimilar groups.
Suggested Citation
Chaoncin Sooksriwong & Ekapong Kachai & Wanruchada Katchamart & Ponlapat Rojnuckarin & Ekaphop Sirachainan & Tuangrat Phodha, 2025.
"Biosimilars in practice: Discriminant factors influencing prescription decisions among physicians in Thailand,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-13, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0327591
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327591
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.