IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0327280.html

Two-period e-commerce platforms operation strategies considering the difference in product quality perception

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Xie
  • Qiqi Guo
  • Yingying Cheng
  • Muqing Niu

Abstract

The difference in consumer perceptions of product quality influences consumers’ propensity to purchase through various channels, thereby affecting the profit of e-commerce platforms and manufacturers. This factor is a critical consideration for e-commerce platforms when formulating their operational strategies in a multi-channel competitive environment. This study focuses on a product retail supply chain comprising two e -commerce platforms, two manufacturers, and strategic consumers. Innovatively, we construct a two-period dynamic pricing game model to compare commission-based and self-operated models for the platforms and deeply explore the impact of consumers’ product quality perception differences on pricing strategies and platform operation model choices. Four scenarios are considered: self-operated model under simultaneous decision-making, commission-based model under simultaneous decision-making, self-operated model under successive decision-making, and commission-based model under successive decision-making. Results show that as the probability of consumers perceiving high-quality products increases, both e-commerce platforms and manufacturers can enhance their profit by raising prices. Moreover, when platforms make decisions simultaneously, they should choose the commission-based model. In contrast, when platforms make decisions sequentially, the leader platform should choose the self-operated model, while the follower platform should choose the commission-based model. In particular, in the context of successive decision-making, after attracting consumers through the low-price strategy in the first period, the leader platform can still effectively maintain market share even if the price is raised in the second period.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Xie & Qiqi Guo & Yingying Cheng & Muqing Niu, 2026. "Two-period e-commerce platforms operation strategies considering the difference in product quality perception," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-27, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327280
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327280
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327280&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0327280?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amit Pazgal & David Soberman, 2008. "Behavior-Based Discrimination: Is It a Winning Play, and If So, When?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(6), pages 977-994, 11-12.
    2. Jiwoong Shin & K. Sudhir, 2010. "A Customer Management Dilemma: When Is It Profitable to Reward One's Own Customers?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 671-689, 07-08.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Krista J. & Zhang, Jianqiang, 2021. "How does customer recognition affect service provision?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 900-914.
    2. Stefano Colombo, 2018. "Behavior‐ and characteristic‐based price discrimination," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 237-250, June.
    3. Miettinen, Topi & Stenbacka, Rune, 2018. "Strategic short-termism: Implications for the management and acquisition of customer relationships," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 200-222.
    4. Bernard Caillaud & Romain de Nijs, 2011. "Strategic loyalty reward in dynamic price Discrimination," PSE Working Papers halshs-00622291, HAL.
    5. Stefano Colombo, 2016. "Imperfect Behavior‐Based Price Discrimination," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 563-583, September.
    6. Upender Subramanian & Jagmohan S. Raju & Z. John Zhang, 2014. "The Strategic Value of High-Cost Customers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 494-507, February.
    7. Qiaowei Shen & J. Miguel Villas-Boas, 2018. "Behavior-Based Advertising," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 2047-2064, May.
    8. Zhang, Jian & Laidlaw, Emily B. & Patterson, Raymond A., 2025. "Flexibility-based price discrimination in a competitive context considering consumers’ socioeconomic status," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(3), pages 810-829.
    9. Raphael Thomadsen & Robert Zeithammer & Ganesh Iyer & Dina Mayzlin & Yesim Orhun & Amit Pazgal & Devavrat Purohit & Ram Rao & Michael Riordan & Jiwoong Shin & Monic Sun & Miguel Villas-Boas, 2012. "A reflection on analytical work in marketing: Three points of consensus," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 381-389, June.
    10. Jeong, Yuncheol & Maruyama, Masayoshi, 2018. "Positioning and pricing strategies in a market with switching costs and staying costs," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 47-57.
    11. Choe, Chongwoo & Matsushima, Noriaki & Tremblay, Mark J., 2022. "Behavior-based personalized pricing: When firms can share customer information," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    12. Seung Hwan (Shawn) Lee & Scott Fay, 2017. "Why offer lower prices to past customers? Inducing favorable social price comparisons to enhance customer retention," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 123-163, June.
    13. Bernard Caillaud & Romain De Nijs, 2014. "Strategic Loyalty Reward in Dynamic Price Discrimination," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 725-742, September.
    14. Juanjuan Zhang, 2011. "The Perils of Behavior-Based Personalization," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 170-186, 01-02.
    15. Ki-Eun Rhee, 2025. "Competitive Price Discrimination in Asymmetric Oligopoly," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 67(1), pages 83-110, June.
    16. Yang, Rui & Tang, Wansheng & Dou, Mengdi & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2021. "Pricing and investing in co-creation with customers for a duopoly," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    17. Zuzana Brokesova & Cary Deck & Jana Peliova, 2014. "Experimenting with Behavior Based Pricing," Working Papers 14-12, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    18. Chongwoo Choe & Noriaki Matsushima, 2021. "Behavior-Based Price Discrimination and Product Choice," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 58(2), pages 263-273, March.
    19. Koray Cosguner & Tat Y. Chan & P. B. (Seethu) Seetharaman, 2017. "Behavioral Price Discrimination in the Presence of Switching Costs," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 426-435, May.
    20. Changying Li & Jianhu Zhang, 2025. "Behaviour‐based pricing with overlapping ownership," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(1), pages 136-168, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.