Author
Listed:
- Bo Xie
- Qiqi Guo
- Yingying Cheng
- Muqing Niu
Abstract
The difference in consumer perceptions of product quality influences consumers’ propensity to purchase through various channels, thereby affecting the profit of e-commerce platforms and manufacturers. This factor is a critical consideration for e-commerce platforms when formulating their operational strategies in a multi-channel competitive environment. This study focuses on a product retail supply chain comprising two e -commerce platforms, two manufacturers, and strategic consumers. Innovatively, we construct a two-period dynamic pricing game model to compare commission-based and self-operated models for the platforms and deeply explore the impact of consumers’ product quality perception differences on pricing strategies and platform operation model choices. Four scenarios are considered: self-operated model under simultaneous decision-making, commission-based model under simultaneous decision-making, self-operated model under successive decision-making, and commission-based model under successive decision-making. Results show that as the probability of consumers perceiving high-quality products increases, both e-commerce platforms and manufacturers can enhance their profit by raising prices. Moreover, when platforms make decisions simultaneously, they should choose the commission-based model. In contrast, when platforms make decisions sequentially, the leader platform should choose the self-operated model, while the follower platform should choose the commission-based model. In particular, in the context of successive decision-making, after attracting consumers through the low-price strategy in the first period, the leader platform can still effectively maintain market share even if the price is raised in the second period.
Suggested Citation
Bo Xie & Qiqi Guo & Yingying Cheng & Muqing Niu, 2026.
"Two-period e-commerce platforms operation strategies considering the difference in product quality perception,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-27, March.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0327280
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327280
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.