IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0327241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive analysis of smart bed comfort across varied resting conditions using quantitative measures

Author

Listed:
  • Xiangtian Bai
  • Ming Zhong
  • Yonghong Liu
  • Yafan Hu
  • Jun Ma

Abstract

Smart beds have become increasingly accepted, and are concurrently reshaping their lifestyles. Addressing the limited ability of smart beds to cater to health requirements, this study investigated smart bed comfort across diverse typical conditions. Objective body pressure distribution and participant-reported perceived comfort were recorded during typical smart bed usage. Statistical analysis was utilized to investigate overall and local comfort variations across different conditions and the correlation between perceived comfort and body pressure distribution. Statistical analysis highlighted the importance of equalizing forces and minimizing peak pressures. Alongside mean pressure, peak pressure—particularly in the buttock, thigh, and shank areas—played a pivotal role in comfort evaluation. Optimal bed board partitioning and interlinked mechanisms between adjacent boards enhance body curve fit and overall comfort. Balancing body forces and preventing feelings of weightlessness significantly improve user comfort and health. This analysis has been used to develop a comfort prediction model for smart bed design.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiangtian Bai & Ming Zhong & Yonghong Liu & Yafan Hu & Jun Ma, 2025. "Comprehensive analysis of smart bed comfort across varied resting conditions using quantitative measures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327241
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327241
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327241&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0327241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.