IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0327197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of antibiotic prescribing for the treatment of male community-acquired urinary tract infections using reimbursement data

Author

Listed:
  • Adrien Biguenet
  • Céline Slekovec
  • Kévin Bouiller
  • Xavier Bertrand

Abstract

Introduction: Urinary tract infection (UTI) in men, although less common than in women, present specific diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This study aims to evaluate the prescribing practices of general practitioners (GPs) for male UTI in France, focusing on adherence to guidelines. Materials and methods: We used an anonymous reimbursement database of antibiotics prescribed 15 days around an urine culture between September 2019 and August 2022 in a French region. Antibiotic prescriptions for male UTI were analysed according to adherence to national guidelines. Cluster analysis was used to identify different GP prescribing profiles. Prescription duration was assessed according to the number of antibiotic boxes delivered in the community pharmacy. Results: We included 7,816 urine culture prescriptions from 940 GPs for 6,457 male patients. We estimated compliance with French recommendations to be 55.7% for empirical treatment and 68.1% for documented treatment. GPs were divided into three clusters with different adherence to recommendations of 22%, 44% and 77%. Treatment duration for fluoroquinolones and cotrimoxazole was heterogeneous between GPs, but mainly too short. Conclusions: Our results suggest that our method could identify GPs who do not prescribe in accordance with recommendations and enable health insurance systems to target educational interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrien Biguenet & Céline Slekovec & Kévin Bouiller & Xavier Bertrand, 2025. "Evaluation of antibiotic prescribing for the treatment of male community-acquired urinary tract infections using reimbursement data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327197
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327197
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327197&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0327197?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.