IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0327190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In utero exposure to electronic cigarette carriers alters craniofacial morphology

Author

Listed:
  • Ethan Richlak
  • Logan Shope
  • Ethan Leonard
  • Leslie Sewell
  • Tyler Maykovich
  • Amr Mohi
  • Roy A Miller
  • Matthew W Gorr
  • Loren E Wold
  • James J Cray

Abstract

Objectives: Despite the popularity of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), there is currently a lack of regulation and consistency regarding the formulation of the e-liquids that undergo combustion in use. The two main constituents of most e-liquids are the humectants propylene glycol (PG) and glycerol (vegetable glycerin, VG). E-liquids consist of a ratio of these two components with PG utilized to increase the “throat hit” effect and VG used to increase visible vapor. As PG-based e-liquids are known to generate more carcinogenic carbonyls and increase the uptake of nicotine, many commercial products have moved toward a more VG-centric formulation to reduce potential harm. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that a common VG-based formulation (30/70 PG/VG) would result in fewer negative effects on craniofacial growth compared to an evenly concentrated formulation (50/50 PG/VG) in the absence of nicotine. Materials and Methods: Adult breeder mice were utilized to generate in utero ENDS component exposed litters including free air exposure (control), 30/70 PG/VG, and 50/50 PG/VG groups. The resulting pups were assessed at postnatal day 14 for skull morphology. Results: Data demonstrate significant reductions in body weight, facial, and cranial dimensions, where there was a significant reduction in growth for the 30/70 PG/VG exposed group. There were no significant differences found between control and 50/50 PG/VG. Conclusions: These results suggest the overall movement to a more VG-centric ENDS formulation may not result in reduced profile for health concerns. Further, it suggests that PG/VG are not a harmless carrier and now popular nicotine-free ENDS formulation may not be considered safe for use in pregnant populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ethan Richlak & Logan Shope & Ethan Leonard & Leslie Sewell & Tyler Maykovich & Amr Mohi & Roy A Miller & Matthew W Gorr & Loren E Wold & James J Cray, 2025. "In utero exposure to electronic cigarette carriers alters craniofacial morphology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327190
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327190
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327190&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0327190?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.