IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0327004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Repercussions faced by health professionals who have experienced the phenomenon of the second victims due to incidents related to patient safety: A scoping review protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Elaine Cristine da Conceição Vianna Gonçalves da Costa
  • Luana Cardoso Pestana
  • Laríssia Admá de Souza Pereira
  • Fabrício Glauber Suzano Maciel
  • Cíntia Silva Fassarella
  • Renata Eloah de Lucena Ferretti-Rebustini
  • Cristiane Helena Gallasch

Abstract

Introduction:: Patient safety is a relevant, timely and globally significant topic. In hospital settings, despite ongoing discussions and advances in patient safety, adverse events continue to occur, impacting not only patients but also healthcare professionals. Health professionals involved in adverse events are considered second victims. This justifies the growing and pertinent interest in the phenomenon of second victim, as this experience affects the competencies and skills of health professionals while influencing their personal livesand general health. Objective:: To map and characterize the repercussions experienced by health professionals who have experienced the phenomenon of second victims due to incidents or adverse events related to patient safety in health services. Method:: We will conduct a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute’s methodology for scoping reviews, in alignment with the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) extension. The databases to be searched include PUBMED, SCOPUS, CINAHL, Web of Science (WOS) and LILACS, while the gray literature will be retrieved from the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (BDTD) and PROQUEST. The identified studies will be compiled and uploaded to EndNote (version X9.3.3), where duplicates will be removed. Two independent reviewers will import the studies into the Rayyan QCR® for organization and selection, with disagreements resolved by a third party. The selection of studies will be based on the population, the concept investigated and the context. The data will be extracted through a pre-established form. Results:: The findings will be analyzed in a descriptive and narrative way, aligning the data with the objective of the study and the research question. The data will are presented in tables, diagrams, and graphs containing information from the extraction tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Elaine Cristine da Conceição Vianna Gonçalves da Costa & Luana Cardoso Pestana & Laríssia Admá de Souza Pereira & Fabrício Glauber Suzano Maciel & Cíntia Silva Fassarella & Renata Eloah de Lucena Ferr, 2025. "Repercussions faced by health professionals who have experienced the phenomenon of the second victims due to incidents related to patient safety: A scoping review protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-8, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327004
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327004&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0327004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.