IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0326993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consensus structure prediction of A. thaliana’s MCTP4 structure using prediction tools and coarse grained simulations of transmembrane domain dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Sujith Sritharan
  • Raphaelle Versini
  • Jules D Petit
  • Emmanuelle E Bayer
  • Antoine Taly

Abstract

Multiple C2 Domains and Transmembrane region Proteins (MCTPs) in plants have been identified as important functional and structural components of plasmodesmata cytoplasmic bridges, which are vital for cell-cell communication. MCTPs are endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated proteins which contain three to four C2 domains and two transmembrane regions. In this study, we created structural models of Arabidopsis MCTP4 ER-anchor transmembrane region (TMR) domain using several prediction methods based on deep learning (DL). This region, critical for driving ER association, presents a complex domain organization and remains largely unknown. Our study demonstrates that using a single deep-learning method to predict the structure of membrane proteins can be challenging. Our models presented three different conformations for the MCTP4 structure, provided by different deep learning methods, indicating the potential complexity of the protein’s conformational landscape. We then used physics-based molecular dynamics simulations to explore the behaviour of the TMR of MCTPs within the lipid bilayer.We found that the TMR of MCTP4 is not rigid but can adopt multiple conformations. The membrane-embedded region contains two helical pairs: HP1 (TM1–TM2) and HP2 (TM3–TM4). Deep learning predictions revealed three distinct types of inter-helical contact interfaces: ESMFold, AlphaFold-Multimer, trRosetta, and RoseTTAFold consistently predicted a TM2–TM3 contact; AlphaFold2 did not predict any contact between these two helical pairs, while OmegaFold instead suggested a TM1–TM4 interface. Our physics-based coarse-grained simulations not only confirmed the contacts predicted by these models but also revealed a broader conformational landscape. In particular, structural clustering identified five distinct conformational clusters, with additional and more extensive inter-helical contacts not captured by the deep learning predictions. These findings underscore the complexity of predicting protein structures. We learned that combining different methods, such as deep learning and simulations, enhances our understanding of complex proteins.

Suggested Citation

  • Sujith Sritharan & Raphaelle Versini & Jules D Petit & Emmanuelle E Bayer & Antoine Taly, 2025. "Consensus structure prediction of A. thaliana’s MCTP4 structure using prediction tools and coarse grained simulations of transmembrane domain dynamics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326993
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326993
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326993&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0326993?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.