IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0326777.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical efficacy and Safety of Baloxavir Marboxil compared with Oseltamivir against influenza virus in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Zhu
  • Li Zhong
  • Guidong Huang

Abstract

Objective: Comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of baloxavir marboxil and oseltamivir against influenza viruses in children, to provide theoretical references for clinical practice. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, CNKI, Wipu.com, Wan Fang Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database for articles published up to December 25th, 2024, was conducted. After literature screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation, descriptive analysis was performed. Results: Eight papers were included, comprising three randomized controlled studies and Five cohort studies, involving 3141 patients (1745 in the baloxavir marboxil group and 1396 in the oseltamivir group). Meta-analysis revealed no significant differences in time to remission of influenza symptoms and duration of fever between the two groups. However, baloxavir marboxil demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in influenza virus titer and RNA load. Additionally, the incidence of adverse events was significantly lower with baloxavir marboxil (p = 0.03). Conclusions: Baloxavir marboxil appears more effective than oseltamivir in reducing viral load and is associated with fewer adverse events in children with influenza, while both drugs yield comparable effects in relieving symptoms. Given the limited number of included studies and absence of subgroup analyses, further well-designed trials are needed to corroborate these findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Zhu & Li Zhong & Guidong Huang, 2025. "Clinical efficacy and Safety of Baloxavir Marboxil compared with Oseltamivir against influenza virus in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326777
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326777
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326777
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326777&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0326777?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326777. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.