IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0326755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of out-of-pocket expenses on children with cancer in Tanzania: A mixed-methods economic study

Author

Listed:
  • Emily R Smith
  • Pamela Espinoza
  • Happiness D Kajoka
  • Henry E Rice
  • Madeline Metcalf
  • Anna Tupetz
  • Cesia Cotache-Condor
  • Blandina T Mmbaga
  • Catherine Staton
  • Esther Majaliwa

Abstract

Background: For children with cancer in low- and middle-income countries, medical and non-medical expenses are often paid through out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures, which pose significant barriers to timely care. Our study aims to estimate the impact of OOP expenditures for cancer care for children in Tanzania through a mixed-methods approach. Methods: We used an explanatory mixed-method design to evaluate the impact of OOP expenditures for children receiving cancer care at the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center in Tanzania based on the Three Delays Framework. Quantitative data were collected to measure OOP expenditures and to assess the risk of catastrophic health expenditure or depth of impoverishment associated. Qualitative interviews were conducted to evaluate financial barriers and facilitators to care and were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Qualitative and quantitative data were triangulated to compare themes, identify areas of agreement or dissonance, and assess for complementarity. Results: Thirteen caregivers of children with cancer at KCMC formed the study cohort. Most lived in a rural setting (92%) and were farmers or livestock keepers (68%). Quantitative analysis showed that total median OOP health expenditures were $53.01 (IQR: 26.50–106.01). All families were pushed further into poverty from the OOP expenses as shown by widening poverty gaps. Qualitative interviews revealed several themes related to financial challenges for families with cancer, particularly during the time period prior to definitive care including worry about job losses and having to sell assets to reach care. Data triangulation confirmed strong agreement between qualitative and quantitative data on the impact of financial barriers on care. However, families stated higher OOP costs in qualitative interviews compared to quantitative data. Conclusions: Protecting families from impoverishment by reducing OOP costs during time periods prior to receiving definitive care may be a strategic way to improve timely diagnosis and early treatment for children with cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily R Smith & Pamela Espinoza & Happiness D Kajoka & Henry E Rice & Madeline Metcalf & Anna Tupetz & Cesia Cotache-Condor & Blandina T Mmbaga & Catherine Staton & Esther Majaliwa, 2025. "Impact of out-of-pocket expenses on children with cancer in Tanzania: A mixed-methods economic study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326755
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326755
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326755&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0326755?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.