IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0326753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: Associations with changes in burnout and mental well-being among NHS mental health staff in England

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Kika
  • Nora Trompeter
  • Danielle Lamb
  • Rupa Bhundia
  • Ewan Carr
  • Brendan Dempsey
  • Neil Greenberg
  • Ira Madan
  • Christopher Penfold
  • Rosalind Raine
  • Simon Wessely
  • Sharon A M Stevelink

Abstract

Background: The pressures of the COVID-19 pandemic placed mental healthcare professionals at an increased risk of burnout and decreased mental wellbeing. Resilience strategies have been put in place as a protective measure, but little is known about how mental wellbeing evolved over time in this group and how resilience affects it. This study aimed to: 1) investigate long-term changes in burnout and mental well-being among mental healthcare professionals working in the National Health Service (NHS) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom (UK); and 2) examine whether baseline resilience levels predicted decreased burnout and increased mental well-being over the course of the pandemic. Methods: The study used data from NHS CHECK, a longitudinal cohort study investigating NHS staff mental health and well-being since the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical mental health staff (n = 3,289) who completed self-report measures at three time points (baseline, 6 and 12 months later). Baseline surveys were conducted during the initial pandemic peak (April 2020 – June 2020; n = 543), the initial easing of restrictions (July 2020 – September 2020; n = 1,098), and the second peak (October 2020 – January 2021, n = 1,648). Results: Mixed model analyses showed that burnout scores increased over time, with higher resilience at baseline predicting lower burnout 6 and 12 months later. However, rises in burnout were most pronounced in the high resilience group. Well-being remained relatively stable over time, with staff with higher resilience at baseline reporting higher well-being over time. Conclusions: Resilience was linked with both lower burnout and higher well-being in NHS mental health staff throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite showing steeper increases in burnout, staff with high initial resilience still maintained lower absolute levels of burnout compared to those with lower resilience. Healthcare organizations should consider providing interventions focusing on organizational factors in addition to individual-level resilience-focused support.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Kika & Nora Trompeter & Danielle Lamb & Rupa Bhundia & Ewan Carr & Brendan Dempsey & Neil Greenberg & Ira Madan & Christopher Penfold & Rosalind Raine & Simon Wessely & Sharon A M Stevelink, 2025. "Resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: Associations with changes in burnout and mental well-being among NHS mental health staff in England," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326753
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326753
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326753&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0326753?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.