Author
Listed:
- Jaouad Abari
- Marco Matulic
- Pablo Galeazzi
- Masoud Zoka Assadi
- Paul Van de Heyning
- Vedat Topsakal
Abstract
Introduction: Robot-assisted cochlear implantation surgery (RACIS) involves the drilling of a keyhole access to the inner ear for cochlear implant placement to treat patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. RACIS with the HEARO-procedure does not require the drilling of a mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy to pass through the facial recess. Instead, it directly drills through it guarding a safe distance from both the facial nerve and chorda tympani. Cochlear implantation surgery involves a well described risk for facial nerve injury when passing through the facial recess. Neuromonitoring as a safety protocol gained great importance in conventional CI surgery and is proving its benefits in RACIS. RACIS in the HEARO-procedure involves a customized facial nerve monitoring (FNM) device that was designed and tested in an animal model study. Here, this device was retrospectively assessed in the largest series of patients undergoing the HEARO-procedure. Materials and methods: The safety protocol in the HEARO-procedure involves FNM and intra-operative cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging with a 0.1 mm spatial resolution. The customized FNM device was employed, using both active mono- and bipolar stimulation to estimate the distance to the facial nerve in RACIS. Linear regression was used to determine if the minimum stimulation thresholds (FNM) could significantly predict the intra-operative distance (CBCT) between the drilled trajectory and the facial nerve. Logistic regression was used to calculate if FNM can distinguish distances smaller and greater than 0.4 mm to the facial nerve. Results: The minimum stimulation thresholds significantly predicted the distances between the drilling trajectory and the facial nerve for both the monopolar (p = 0.001) and bipolar 3 (p = 0.008) stimulation configuration. Both the monopolar (β = -0.189, S.E. = 0.063, p = 0.003) and bipolar 3 (β = -0.187, S.E. = 0.080, p = 0.019) stimulation configuration are negative and significant predictors of the probability of the distance being smaller than 0.4 mm. Conclusion: FNM will alert the surgeon when the drilling trajectory comes closer than 0.4 mm to the facial nerve in RACIS. A linear relationship was observed between the minimum stimulation thresholds and the intra-operative distance towards the facial nerve.
Suggested Citation
Jaouad Abari & Marco Matulic & Pablo Galeazzi & Masoud Zoka Assadi & Paul Van de Heyning & Vedat Topsakal, 2025.
"Retrospective evaluation of Facial nerve monitoring to prevent nerve damage during robotic drilling in the largest series of patients undergoing the HEARO-procedure,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-11, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0326614
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326614
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.