IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0326558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding dimensions of trust in AI through quantitative cognition: Implications for human-AI collaboration

Author

Listed:
  • Weizheng Jiang
  • Dongqin Li
  • Chun Liu

Abstract

Human-AI collaborative innovation relies on effective and clearly defined role allocation, yet empirical research in this area remains limited. To address this gap, we construct a cognitive taxonomy trust in AI framework to describe and explain its interactive mechanisms in human-AI collaboration, specifically its complementary and inhibitive effects. Specifically, we examine the alignment between trust in AI and different cognitive levels, identifying key drivers that facilitate both lower-order and higher-order cognition through AI. Furthermore, by analyzing the interactive effects of multidimensional trust in AI, we explore its complementary and inhibitive influences. We collected data from finance and business administration interns using surveys and the After-Action Review method and analyzed them using the gradient descent algorithm. The findings reveal a dual effect of trust in AI on cognition: while functional and emotional trust enhance higher-order cognition, the transparency dimension of cognitive trust inhibits cognitive processes. These insights provide a theoretical foundation for understanding trust in AI in human-AI collaboration and offer practical guidance for university-industry partnerships and knowledge innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Weizheng Jiang & Dongqin Li & Chun Liu, 2025. "Understanding dimensions of trust in AI through quantitative cognition: Implications for human-AI collaboration," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326558
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326558
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326558&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0326558?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.