IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0326525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards implementation of independent calculation-based dose verification in proton therapy

Author

Listed:
  • Nichakan Chatchumnan
  • Mananchaya Vimolnoch
  • Sakda Kingkaew
  • Puntiwa Oonsiri
  • Sornjarod Oonsiri

Abstract

Background: Proton therapy offers precision in targeting tumors while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissues. Independent dose calculation is a secondary dose validation tool for patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) using Monte Carlo simulations. Purpose: To implement independent dose calculation for PSQA in proton therapy and establish confidence limits, tolerance limits, and action limits. Methods and Materials: The point dose validation of independent dose calculation was performed by ionization chamber. The dose distributions between independent dose calculation and treatment planning calculation were compared in single and multiple energy plans. Fifty clinical plans covering five regions (head and neck, breast, chest, abdomen, and pelvis) were evaluated using the gamma analysis criteria of 3%, 3 mm, and 5%, 3 mm. Confidence limits, tolerance limits, and action limits were determined. Results: The dose differences between measurement and independent dose calculation for each energy level were within 1.0%. The results showing gamma passing rates of 99.4 ± 0.6% for single energy plans and over 98.0% for multiple energy plans. The average gamma passing rates for all treatment sites was 95.9 ± 2.7% with 3%/3 mm criteria, which increased to 97.9 ± 1.8% with 5%/3 mm criteria. The confidence limits, tolerance limits, and action limits showed 90.7%, 89.1%, and 85.4% with 3%/3 mm criteria and 94.3%, 93.2%, and 91.6% for 5%/3 mm criteria, respectively. Conclusions: The independent dose calculation could potentially be implemented in PSQA. It is a secondary dose validation method for busy clinic. Particular attention should be paid to a confidence limit, tolerance limit, and action limit for reliable treatments.

Suggested Citation

  • Nichakan Chatchumnan & Mananchaya Vimolnoch & Sakda Kingkaew & Puntiwa Oonsiri & Sornjarod Oonsiri, 2025. "Towards implementation of independent calculation-based dose verification in proton therapy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-8, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326525
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326525
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326525&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0326525?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.