Author
Listed:
- Xiaodan Li
- Yunci Guo
- Zhen Liu
- Dandan Sun
- Yidi Liu
- Wencan Wang
Abstract
The acceleration of global urbanization and the rapid growth of urban populations have intensified the complexity and urgency of parking demand. In megacities with limited land resources, efficiently addressing diverse parking needs has become a critical issue for sustainable urban development. Multi-objective optimization methods are widely applied to tackle such challenges, providing decision-makers with a set of optimal solutions that balance multiple objectives. However, existing studies often lack quantitative analyses of the relationships among these solutions, limiting their applicability in accommodating decision-makers with varying preferences. This study focuses on Jing’an District in Shanghai, a representative region of a Chinese megacity, to address this global issue. Based on real-world data, a multi-objective optimization model is constructed considering convenience, coverage, and cost-efficiency. The model is solved using an improved Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), which dynamically adjusts crossover and mutation rates. Furthermore, the Pareto solution set is quantitatively analyzed from a cost-benefit perspective by integrating marginal benefit theory. This approach provides robust support for decision-makers seeking an optimal balance between cost and benefit, offering scenario-specific strategies. The findings of this study not only present an innovative, systematic, and flexible solution to the “parking dilemma” in high-density residential areas but also provide practical guidance and insights for other large cities in the planning and implementation of smart underground parking facilities.
Suggested Citation
Xiaodan Li & Yunci Guo & Zhen Liu & Dandan Sun & Yidi Liu & Wencan Wang, 2025.
"A study on multi-objective optimization for the location selection of smart underground parking facilities in high-density urban areas of megacities: A case study of Jing’an district, Shanghai,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-29, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0326455
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326455
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.