Author
Listed:
- Kate O’Doherty
- Aileen Rothwell
- Valerie Smith
Abstract
Care bundles, which consist of three or more interventions implemented together, may help address the global rise in caesarean births. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of care bundles designed to reduce caesarean section (CS). MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL and Embase were searched from January 2000 to June 2024 using terms related to CS and care bundles. Grey literature and professional body websites were also searched. Randomised or non-randomised studies reporting on pregnant or labouring women who received a care bundle designed to reduce CS safely were eligible. Data were extracted by two reviewers independently. Pre-specified outcomes included CS (overall, elective, and emergency), assisted vaginal birth, neonatal admission to intensive care, and care bundle compliance. Meta-analyses were undertaken using Review Manager 5.4 and a random effects model. Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were calculated. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Ten non-randomised studies were included. Care bundles reduced CS overall (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.97) and emergency CS (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.98). No differences were observed in assisted vaginal birth (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.33) or neonatal admission to intensive care (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.56 to 2.02). Compliance to the care bundles ranged from 50% to 92%. The certainty of the evidence for all outcomes was very low. Randomised trial research is required to better assess care bundle use in reducing CS safely.
Suggested Citation
Kate O’Doherty & Aileen Rothwell & Valerie Smith, 2025.
"The effectiveness of care bundles for reducing caesarean section safely: A systematic review and meta-analysis,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-13, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0326158
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326158
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.