IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0326131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health service utilization and associated factors among fee waiver beneficiaries in Ethiopia: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Bizunesh Fantahun Kase
  • Hiwot Altaye Asebe
  • Etsay Woldu Anbesu
  • Dejen Kahsay Asgedom
  • Abubeker Alebachew Seid
  • Abdulkerim Hassen Moloro
  • Aragaw Asfaw Hasen
  • Nuru Mohammed Hussen
  • Molla Getie Mehari
  • Kassaye Getaneh Arge
  • Abdu Hailu Shibeshi

Abstract

Background: Health service utilization serves as a vital indicator of healthcare access and equity. In Ethiopia, the fee waiver system is a key component of healthcare financing reforms designed to improve access to essential health services for economically disadvantaged populations. However, the evidence regarding health service utilization among fee waiver beneficiaries remains inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesize existing studies to provide comprehensive insight on health service utilization and associated factors among fee waiver beneficiaries in Ethiopia. Methods: A systematic search of peer-reviewed articles and gray literature was conducted up to February 2024, in databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, African Journals Online (AJOL), Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Science Direct, Research4life, and Google Scholar. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Data were extracted using Microsoft Excel and analyzed with STATA 17 software. The quality of studies was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists. The pooled prevalence of health service utilization among fee waiver beneficiaries was estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed based on study regions. Publication bias was evaluated with a DOI plot, the Luis Furuya Kanamori (LFK) index, and Egger’s test, while heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results: The study analyzed seven primary studies comprising a total of 11,488 participants. All the included studies demonstrated a low risk of bias, and no significant evidence of publication bias was detected among them. The pooled prevalence of health service utilization was found to be 60.57% (95% CI: 58.11–63.04; I² = 54.2%, p = 0.041). A family size of fewer than five was negatively and significantly associated with health service utilization (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51–0.95; I² = 0.0%, p = 0.47). On the other hand, having chronic diseases was positively and significantly associated with health service utilization among fee waiver beneficiaries (OR = 4.85, 95% CI: 1.34–17.56; I² = 93.5%, p

Suggested Citation

  • Bizunesh Fantahun Kase & Hiwot Altaye Asebe & Etsay Woldu Anbesu & Dejen Kahsay Asgedom & Abubeker Alebachew Seid & Abdulkerim Hassen Moloro & Aragaw Asfaw Hasen & Nuru Mohammed Hussen & Molla Getie M, 2025. "Health service utilization and associated factors among fee waiver beneficiaries in Ethiopia: Systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326131
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326131
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326131&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0326131?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.