IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0326045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the barriers and facilities migrants face in accessing COVID-19 vaccines in Malaysia: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Tharani Loganathan
  • Amirah Zafirah Zaini
  • Hazreen Abdul Majid

Abstract

Background: Malaysia provided COVID-19 vaccines for all residents, regardless of citizenship status. However, the extent of vaccine accessibility for migrant populations remains unclear, given the complex healthcare barriers they face. This study explored the barriers migrants faced in accessing COVID-19 vaccines and the measures taken to facilitate their access. Methods: This qualitative study, conducted between April 2022 and February 2023, involved 32 purposively selected key informants from non-governmental organisations (7), international organisations (2), labour unions (2), healthcare providers (11) and migrant communities (10). Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured, primarily individual interviews, and analysed using NVivo 12 Pro software following a six-phase thematic analysis: data familiarisation, code generation, theme identification, theme review, theme definition, and reporting. Results: Thematic analysis identified barriers—including legal and administrative challenges, digital exclusion, vaccine hesitancy, and logistical issues—and facilitators, such as mandatory vaccination policies, innovative delivery approaches, communication support, and community engagement. Substantial challenges arose from pervasive distrust in healthcare services, compounded by identity document requirements, roadblocks, and fears of immigration arrests. Digital appointment systems excluded many migrants due to language and literacy barriers, data privacy concerns, and the need for identity documents. While vaccine hesitancy among migrants was generally low, concerns were primarily driven by fears of immigration enforcement rather than vaccine safety. Despite vaccination being voluntary, mandatory requirements for digital vaccination certificates or negative COVID-19 test results strongly incentivised uptake. Employer support, driven by economic interests, played a critical role in promoting compliance with workplace vaccination mandates. Collaboration with non-governmental organisations and community partners proved pivotal, offering tailored health communication and building trust. Flexible vaccine delivery strategies, including a shift from centralised to outreach models near residences and workplaces, enhanced access, particularly for hard-to-reach populations. Conclusion: Despite numerous challenges, Malaysia’s vaccination efforts were largely successful due to innovative and collaborative delivery and communication strategies. To further improve health equity among marginalised populations, it is essential to enhance culturally sensitive training for frontline workers, strengthen employers’ business ethics, and increase the involvement of trusted stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Tharani Loganathan & Amirah Zafirah Zaini & Hazreen Abdul Majid, 2025. "Exploring the barriers and facilities migrants face in accessing COVID-19 vaccines in Malaysia: A qualitative study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326045
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326045
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326045&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0326045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.