IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0325991.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experiences of recently diagnosed urban COVID-19 outpatients: A survey on patient worries, provider-patient interactions, and neutralizing monoclonal antibody treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Lindsey E Fish
  • Samantha C Roberts
  • Tellen D Bennett
  • Nichole E Carlson
  • Mika K Hamer
  • Bethany M Kwan
  • Seth Russell
  • Adane F Wogu
  • Matthew K Wynia
  • Adit A Ginde

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 patients have experienced worry, altered provider-patient interactions, and options to use novel treatments, initially with neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Limited research has been performed on these aspects of the COVID-19 outpatient experience. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the experiences of outpatients recently diagnosed with COVID-19, who were eligible for use of mAbs, during the diagnosis and treatment process based on sociodemographic and clinical factors. Methods: This was a self-reported cohort study performed via telephone surveys. Participants included COVID-19 outpatients who met at least one emergency use criterion for mAbs during the first 120 days after a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. We analyzed survey results using multivariable logistic regression for non-scale outcomes and adjusted proportional odds logistic regression for scaled outcomes. Results: Greater worry about their COVID-19 diagnosis was reported by younger, female, and Hispanic patients and those with Medicaid insurance, two or more comorbid conditions, BMI > 25, and at least 2 COVID-19 vaccinations. Greater provider trust was reported by patients with ≥ 2 years of college education, one or more comorbid conditions, and one or more COVID-19 vaccinations; whereas less provider trust was reported by patients ages 45–64 years, with usual place of care in a walk-in clinic, and those without Commercial, Medicare, or Medicaid insurance. In patients who did not receive mAbs, patients with Medicaid and those without Commercial/Medicare insurance were among the factors that were less likely be offered mAbs by a provider. Discussion: This report describes factors associated with multiple aspects of outpatients’ experience of COVID-19. This study demonstrated that there are important differences in the experience of outpatient COVID-19 patients based on sociodemographic factors and clinical factors, as well as where additional strategies are needed to improve this experience and associated outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindsey E Fish & Samantha C Roberts & Tellen D Bennett & Nichole E Carlson & Mika K Hamer & Bethany M Kwan & Seth Russell & Adane F Wogu & Matthew K Wynia & Adit A Ginde, 2025. "Experiences of recently diagnosed urban COVID-19 outpatients: A survey on patient worries, provider-patient interactions, and neutralizing monoclonal antibody treatment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325991
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325991
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325991&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0325991?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.