Author
Listed:
- Orlando Luiz do Amaral Junior
- Maria Laura Braccini Fagundes
- Augusto Bacelo Bidinotto
- Matheus Neves
- Fernando Neves Hugo
- Jessye Melgarejo do Amaral Giordani
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to verify if there is an association between functional dentition and ultra-processed diet in Brazilian adults. Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from the National Health Survey (PNS) 2019. For the present study, we included only adults aged 18–49 (n = 50,146). The outcome was the ultra-processed food consumption score, calculated based on the sum of positive responses regarding the consumption of 10 subgroups of ultra-processed foods on the previous day. These subgroups represent foods widely consumed in Brazil, and the scoring method has been previously validated for this purpose. The main predictor used was the variable ‘functional dentition’, categorized into individuals with less than 20 teeth and individuals with 20 or more teeth (functional dentition). Multivariate analysis was performed using the Poisson regression model with robust variance to estimate crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (PR). Results: It was observed that the presence of functional dentition (20 or more teeth) was not associated with a greater consumption of an ultra-processed diet (RP = 0.97 [95% CI: 0.91–1.05]), p = 0.578). Conclusion: The lack of a significant association between functional dentition and ultra-processed foods consumption suggests that social determinants might play a more important role in shaping dietary habits. The implementation of public policies that promote equitable access to healthy foods and preventive oral health care could contribute to overall health improvements and inequalities reduction.
Suggested Citation
Orlando Luiz do Amaral Junior & Maria Laura Braccini Fagundes & Augusto Bacelo Bidinotto & Matheus Neves & Fernando Neves Hugo & Jessye Melgarejo do Amaral Giordani, 2025.
"Association between functional dentition and ultra-processed food consumption in Brazilian adults: A cross-sectional study,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-10, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0325838
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325838
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.