IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0325808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

First-line toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jing-Wen Han
  • Yu Zhong
  • Jin Zhong
  • Wen-Jing Zeng
  • Li-Jun Sun

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of toripalimab combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as a first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) from the perspective of U.S. healthcare payers. Methods: A 10-year partitioned survival model was developed using survival data from the JUPITER-06 clinical trial (NCT03829969). Costs included only direct medical expenses, and health utility values were derived from published literature. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to assess the robustness of the model. Results: Toripalimab combined with chemotherapy incurred an incremental cost of $64,483.3 and achieved an incremental effectiveness of 0.53 quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) compared to chemotherapy alone, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $122,771.67 per QALY. This ICER is below the willingness-to-pay threshold in the United States ($150,000). The model results were sensitive to the cost of toripalimab and the utility values of both progression-free and progressed disease states. Conclusions: The findings indicate that toripalimab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced ESCC in the United States provides a cost-effective benefit in comparison to chemotherapy alone.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing-Wen Han & Yu Zhong & Jin Zhong & Wen-Jing Zeng & Li-Jun Sun, 2025. "First-line toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325808
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325808
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325808&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0325808?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.