IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0325793.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designed for simplicity, used for complexity: The systemic pressures shaping walk-in clinic practices and outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Braeden A Terpou
  • Lauren Lapointe-Shaw
  • Ruoxi Wang
  • Danielle Martin
  • Mina Tadrous
  • Sacha Bhatia
  • Jennifer Shuldiner
  • Simon Berthelot
  • Niels Thakkar
  • Kerry McBrien
  • Bahram Rahman
  • Aisha Lofters
  • J Michael Paterson
  • Rita McCracken
  • Christine Salahub
  • Tara Kiran
  • Noah M Ivers
  • Laura Desveaux

Abstract

Walk-in clinics (WICs), appreciated for their accessibility and convenience, have become an increasingly popular healthcare option in Ontario for patients with and without primary care enrolment. Despite their utility, WICs face criticism for delivering lower-quality care compared to comprehensive, enrolment-based primary care models. Critics argue that WICs contribute to system inefficiencies and encourage practice patterns misaligned with population health goals. This study explored physician perspectives on two key outcomes often associated with low-quality care in WICs: repeat primary care visits and potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with Ontario-based family physicians (N = 19) who had experience practicing in both WICs and enrolment-based primary care. The findings highlight systemic challenges, including limited access to enrolment-based primary care and increasing healthcare demands, which have pushed WICs beyond their intended role. This misalignment has created tensions between their structure and purpose, resulting in visits that participants described as more transactional than those in primary care. These constraints—rooted in a lack of informational and relational continuity—often limited participants’ ability to provide in-depth engagement or follow-up care. Repeat visits were frequently linked to efforts to ensure continuity for complex or chronic conditions. Similarly, participants acknowledged the reality of potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, attributing it to the high patient volume, desire to satisfy patient expectations, and a tendency to “err on the side of caution” when the nature of the illness is in question. The findings underscore how health system pressures and well-intended policies, such as Ontario’s primary care access bonus, can produce unintended consequences, including inequities in access and difficulties with care coordination across settings. Addressing these challenges requires reforms to better integrate WICs with the primary care system, alongside tailored training to support physician decision-making in episodic care contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Braeden A Terpou & Lauren Lapointe-Shaw & Ruoxi Wang & Danielle Martin & Mina Tadrous & Sacha Bhatia & Jennifer Shuldiner & Simon Berthelot & Niels Thakkar & Kerry McBrien & Bahram Rahman & Aisha Loft, 2025. "Designed for simplicity, used for complexity: The systemic pressures shaping walk-in clinic practices and outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325793
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325793
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325793&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0325793?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.