IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0325786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy, safety, and economic evaluation of Ojeok-san plus Saengmaek-san for gastroesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough: Protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, multicenter, investigator-initiated clinical trial

Author

Listed:
  • Yee Ran Lyu
  • O-Jin Kwon
  • Ae-Ran Kim
  • Min Ji Kim
  • Yoon Jae Lee
  • Kwan-Il Kim
  • Jae-Woo Park
  • Seok-Jae Ko
  • Yang-Chun Park
  • Jun-Yong Choi
  • Tae-Yong Park
  • Jun-Hwan Lee
  • Beom-Joon Lee

Abstract

Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough (GERC) is a common extraesophageal manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the mechanisms underlying GERC remain unclear, and current treatments with anti-reflux drugs do not provide significant benefits in the management of GERC. Therefore, safe and effective drugs to treat GERC are urgently needed. Methods and analysis: We designed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, multi-center, investigator-initiated clinical trial to assess the efficacy, safety, and economics of combined Ojeok-san (OJS) and Saengmaek-san (SMS) in treating GERC. Our trial will be conducted in five hospitals in Korea, and a total of 138 participants will be enrolled, equally divided between the OJS plus SMS and placebo groups. All participants will be instructed to receive OJS plus SMS or a placebo for 6 weeks and visit hospitals every 2 weeks until week 8 to evaluate their efficacy or safety outcomes. For efficacy outcomes, the cough diary score, cough VAS, Leicester Cough Questionnaire, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire, Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire, and 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional Questionnaire will be evaluated to observe symptoms of cough and GERD, as well as the quality of life in patients with GERC. Pattern identification for the Chronic Cough Questionnaire and gastroesophageal reflux disease will be measured as an additional exploratory outcome. Safety will be assessed in terms of laboratory tests, vital signs, and adverse events; economic evaluation will be simultaneously conducted through the healthcare system and societal perspectives by estimating cost-utility and cost-effectiveness. Conclusion: Our study proposes a combination of OJS and SMS to manage the symptoms of GERC as a new insight and this study results will provide scientific evidence for the use of OJS plus SMS in the treatment of GERC.

Suggested Citation

  • Yee Ran Lyu & O-Jin Kwon & Ae-Ran Kim & Min Ji Kim & Yoon Jae Lee & Kwan-Il Kim & Jae-Woo Park & Seok-Jae Ko & Yang-Chun Park & Jun-Yong Choi & Tae-Yong Park & Jun-Hwan Lee & Beom-Joon Lee, 2025. "Efficacy, safety, and economic evaluation of Ojeok-san plus Saengmaek-san for gastroesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough: Protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, mult," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325786
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325786
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325786&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0325786?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.