IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0325679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of S100A9 as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in septic shock

Author

Listed:
  • Yingxue Hu
  • Qinghui Yang
  • Xiao Liu
  • Li Yuan
  • Fang Yan
  • Yang Li
  • Pingwei Ni

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a severe and potentially fatal systemic condition marked by excessive immune defense against infection. Within this research, we explored the serum concentration of S100A9 during hospital admission, aiming to assess its role and reliability as a viable biomarker for identifying septic shock and predicting mortality risk in sepsis. Furthermore, we explored whether combining S100A9 with conventional assessment tools could enhance diagnostic precision and prognostic accuracy, offering valuable insights to support early intervention and personalized treatment strategies for sepsis. Methods: This study comprised 575 participants overall, with sepsis patients classified into non-shock and shock groups based on the severity of their condition. Additionally, age- and gender-matched ICU control cohort and healthy control group were recruited to ensure wide applicability and strong comparability of the findings. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay utilized for detecting serum S100A9 levels in subjects within 24 hours of admission, ROC curves were used to evaluate the disease identification and prognostic analysis. Differences in survival outcomes among patients with varying levels of S100A9 expression were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Serum S100A9 concentrations were elevated in septic patients upon admission. In the diagnosis of patients with septic shock, S100A9 performed similarly to APACHE II, and a considerable enhancement was noted in the sensitivity of detecting septic shock when S100A9 was combined with lactate and APACHE II. At the initiation of ICU stay, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the association between serum S100A9 levels and 28-day mortality was 0.78. This value surpassed the AUCs for IL-6 (0.66), procalcitonin (0.60), lactate (0.58) and C-reactive protein (0.47). Furthermore, septic patients with elevated serum S100A9 levels (≥ 630.77 pg/ml) exhibited lower survival rates compared to those with lower concentrations (

Suggested Citation

  • Yingxue Hu & Qinghui Yang & Xiao Liu & Li Yuan & Fang Yan & Yang Li & Pingwei Ni, 2025. "The role of S100A9 as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in septic shock," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325679
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325679
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325679&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0325679?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.