IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0325332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The intelligent evaluation model of the English humanistic landscape in agricultural industrial parks by the SPEAKING model: From the perspective of fish-vegetable symbiosis in new agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Yiping He
  • Mingyue Gao
  • Luyao Wang

Abstract

To more accurately capture the expression of the English humanistic landscape in agricultural industrial parks under the emerging agricultural paradigm of fish-vegetable symbiosis, and to address the limitations of unscientific evaluation standards and inadequate adaptability in Chinese-English translation within multimodal contexts, this study proposes an intelligent translation evaluation framework based on the SPEAKING model—comprising Setting, Participants, Ends, Act Sequence, Key, Instrumentalities, Norms, and Genre. The study identifies the core elements essential for articulating the English humanistic landscape of agricultural industrial parks and conducts a comprehensive analysis from the dual perspectives of translation accuracy and adaptability. Fish-vegetable symbiosis, an ecological agricultural system integrating aquaculture and plant cultivation, emphasizes resource recycling and ecological synergy. Internationally referred to as the “aquaponics system,” this model has become a pivotal direction in sustainable ecological agriculture due to its efficiency and environmental compatibility. This study investigates multimodal translation tasks across text, image, and speech data. It addresses two primary challenges: (1) the absence of robust theoretical grounding in existing translation evaluation systems, which leads to partial and insufficiently contextualized assessments in agricultural industrial park translations; and (2) difficulties in maintaining consistency and readability across multimodal translation tasks, particularly in speech and visual modalities. The proposed optimization model integrates linguistic theory with deep learning techniques, providing a detailed analysis of contextual translation elements. Comparative evaluations are conducted against five prominent translation models: Multilingual T5 (mT5), Multilingual Bidirectional and Auto-Regressive Transformers (mBART), Delta Language Model (DeltaLM), Many-to-Many Multilingual Translation Model-100 (M2M-100), and Marian Machine Translation (MarianMT). Experimental results indicate that the proposed model outperforms existing benchmarks across multiple evaluation metrics. For translation accuracy, the Setting score for text data reaches 96.72, exceeding mT5’s 92.35; the Instrumentalities score for image data is 96.11, outperforming DeltaLM’s 93.12; and the Ends score for speech data achieves 94.83, surpassing MarianMT’s 91.67. In terms of translation adaptability, the Genre score for text data is 96.41, compared to mT5’s 93.21; the Key score for image data is 92.78, slightly higher than mBART’s 92.12; and the Norms score for speech data is 91.78, exceeding DeltaLM’s 90.23. These findings offer both theoretical insights and practical implications for enhancing multimodal translation evaluation systems and optimizing cross-modal translation tasks. The proposed model significantly contributes to improving the accuracy and adaptability of language expression in the context of agricultural landscapes, advancing research in intelligent translation and natural language processing.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiping He & Mingyue Gao & Luyao Wang, 2025. "The intelligent evaluation model of the English humanistic landscape in agricultural industrial parks by the SPEAKING model: From the perspective of fish-vegetable symbiosis in new agriculture," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325332
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325332
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325332&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0325332?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.