IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0325171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-effectiveness analysis of adebrelimab in combination with chemotherapy for first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiwei Zheng
  • Huide Zhu
  • Ling Fang

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of adebrelimab in combination with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) from the Chinese medical perspective. Methods: We have designed a partitioned survival model. The model integrates clinical information pertaining to overall survival, progression-free survival, adverse events and cost data. Our primary measure of outcome in this model is quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The model adopted a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $40,343.68 per QALY. To account for uncertainty in the model parameters, we conducted sensitivity analyses. Results: The total expenditure for the adebrelimab group was $79,549.34, compared to $6,436.80 for the chemotherapy group. The adebrelimab cohort achieved an incremental gain of 1.25 QALY, resulting in an additional cost of $73,112.54. Consequently, the ICER for the adebrelimab group was determined to be $58,490.03 per QALY, surpassing the WTP threshold of $40,343.68 in China. The sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the findings across various scenarios. Conclusion: This cost-effectiveness analysis indicates that adebrelimab plus chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for ES-SCLC was not cost-effective in China with a WTP of $40,343.68.Reducing the cost of adebrelimab promises to improve the cost-effectiveness of this treatment regimen.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiwei Zheng & Huide Zhu & Ling Fang, 2025. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of adebrelimab in combination with chemotherapy for first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325171
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325171
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325171&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0325171?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.