IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0325122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of cognitive behavioural therapy on pain and disability in chronic non-specific low back pain: An overview of systematic reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Tiffany Leung
  • Mei Ken Low
  • Pei Chi Yao
  • Ana-Catarina Pinho-Gomes

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is experienced by most people at least once in their lifetime and is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is a non-invasive method used to manage chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) and contains less adverse effects than analgesic medications. Aims: To determine the efficacy of interventions incorporating CBT on reducing pain intensity and physical disability in CNSLBP. Methods: An overview of reviews without meta-analysis was conducted. Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO) were searched. Adults aged 18 or above with CNSLBP were included. AMSTAR 2 was used to assess risk of bias of included systematic reviews and data synthesis was conducted via vote counting methods. Results: Ten systematic reviews were included. Results showed that CBT is more effective in reducing pain and disability compared to waiting list/usual care (WL/UC). CBT in conjunction with other active treatments (AT) are also more effective than some standalone AT such as physiotherapy and exercise, but less effective than surgery. Conclusion: CBT has some effect in reducing pain and disability, however, it may not be more effective than other treatments. The quality of evidence was low for most outcomes as there was high risk of bias and heterogeneity between studies. Future research could evaluate specific therapies such as acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), as these treatments lacked primary studies. There is no recognised standard for conducting CBT, and further research could determine the most effective duration, mode of delivery (e.g., online, group-based) and intensity of CBT.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiffany Leung & Mei Ken Low & Pei Chi Yao & Ana-Catarina Pinho-Gomes, 2025. "The effect of cognitive behavioural therapy on pain and disability in chronic non-specific low back pain: An overview of systematic reviews," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325122
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325122
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325122&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0325122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.