IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0325114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevalence and its associated factors of medical error reporting among healthcare professionals in Ethiopia: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yeshiambaw Eshetie
  • Tigabu Munye Aytenew
  • Yirgalem Abere
  • Bekalu Mekonen Belay
  • Tekalign Amera
  • Mengistu Ewunetu
  • Gebrie Kassaw Yirga
  • Yohannes Tesfahun
  • Melese Kebede
  • Demewoz Kefale

Abstract

Introduction: Medical error refers to a mistake made by a healthcare professional that poses a significant threat to patient safety worldwide. Reporting these errors is crucial for reducing healthcare-related mistakes. Despite several studies on medical error reporting and its associated factors among health professionals in Ethiopia, the national prevalence and contributing factors are not well established. Methods.: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies assessing the prevalence of medical error reporting and its associated factors among healthcare professionals in Ethiopia. An extensive literature search was performed from April 10 to June 10, 2024, using databases such as Google Scholar, Web of Science, and PubMed, along with a manual search. The pooled prevalence was calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Out of 1233 studies retrieved from databases, only 24 studies involving a total of 6,745 healthcare professionals were included in the analysis. The overall pooled prevalence of medical error reporting was 42.66% (95% CI: 33.19, 52.13; I2 = 98.79%, p

Suggested Citation

  • Yeshiambaw Eshetie & Tigabu Munye Aytenew & Yirgalem Abere & Bekalu Mekonen Belay & Tekalign Amera & Mengistu Ewunetu & Gebrie Kassaw Yirga & Yohannes Tesfahun & Melese Kebede & Demewoz Kefale, 2025. "Prevalence and its associated factors of medical error reporting among healthcare professionals in Ethiopia: Systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325114
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325114
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325114&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0325114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.