IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0324830.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does LLM translation align with translation universals? A cross-genre simplification study on English-Chinese translation based on dependency grammar

Author

Listed:
  • Zeyuan Jiang

Abstract

This study examines the presence of simplification, a translation universal (TU), in English-to-Chinese translation by comparing the Mean Dependency Distance (MDD) and Mean Hierarchical Distance (MHD) of Crowdsourcing human translations, Large Language Model (LLM) translations, and original Chinese texts across fifteen genres. Through analysis of three balanced comparable corpora, the research found that: (i) Compared to original Chinese texts, both human-translated and LLM-translated Chinese texts demonstrated significant syntactic simplification across all genres. (ii) Human translations exhibited a more pronounced tendency toward syntactic simplification than LLM translations across all genres. These findings not only validate the simplification hypothesis at the syntactic level but also highlight the different cognitive and processing mechanisms underlying human and LLM translation processes. The research indicates that human translators possess an active ability to optimize complex syntax that current LLMs lack, providing valuable reference for future development of LLMs and methods for LLM-assisted translation. Additionally, by adopting MDD and MHD as holistic measures of syntactic complexity, this study offers new perspectives for TU research and provides empirical insights into the linguistic nature of crowdsourcing translations from an English-to-Chinese perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeyuan Jiang, 2025. "Does LLM translation align with translation universals? A cross-genre simplification study on English-Chinese translation based on dependency grammar," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324830
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324830
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324830&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0324830?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.