IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0324713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Zipf’s law in China’s local government work reports: A 21-year study using natural language processing and regression analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yanfang LI

Abstract

The examination and application of Zipf’s law is a significant topic in quantitative linguistics. This study presents an in-depth empirical investigation of this law in 651 Chinese provincial government work reports (2003–2023). Employing natural language processing techniques (including Jieba word segmentation with a custom dictionary) and a double-logarithmic regression model, we analyzed word frequency distributions. Our findings indicate that the Zipf coefficient in these reports is close to 1, confirming general adherence to Zipf’s law. Over the 21-year period, the Zipf coefficient exhibits fluctuations, with a notable inflection point in 2011, after which it follows a consistent upward trend. This shift is likely influenced by the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, which marked a transition toward more standardized and centralized policy communication. While regional differences among eastern, central, western, and northeastern provinces are minimal, centrally governed municipalities exhibit higher Zipf coefficients than other provincial-level regions. Although our findings largely confirm the applicability of Zipf’s Law to this specific corpus, this study is limited by the exclusion of prefecture- and county-level reports. Future research can address this limitation by incorporating a broader range of administrative levels and by conducting cross-country and cultural comparisons of political documents. Further investigation of alternate quantitative linguistic laws (e.g., Heaps’ Law, Menzerath’s Law) within this corpus is also warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanfang LI, 2025. "Zipf’s law in China’s local government work reports: A 21-year study using natural language processing and regression analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324713
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324713
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324713&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0324713?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.